Let’s say you want to stir up a little something.
Start with three cups of quiet collaboration. Add in a dash of rumor; a teaspoon each of anti-Semitism, segregation, and Red Scare; and a tablespoon of divisive politics. Stir in money – lots of it – and bake in a ten-gallon hat for three-and-a-half years.
Yields: heated arguments and mouthfuls of hate.
And as you’ll see in the new book “ Dallas 1963” by Bill Minutaglio and Steven L. Davis (c.2013, Twelve, $28, 373 pages), that’s a recipe for changing history.
When the holiday cards arrived at the homes of Dallas ’s “most influential residents,” there was confusion – and consternation.
Signed “Best – Jack,” the cards featured then-Senator John Kennedy and his family on the front. The subtle, assumed message was that Kennedy would run for president, which concerned Dallas ’s powerbrokers – including the world’s richest man, a minister, and a newspaperman.
It was January 1960. Dallas had been steadfastly ignoring Brown v. Board and other unpopular Washington edicts; a liberal Democrat in office was unthinkable. No, the city’s powerful firmly supported Nixon for the upcoming election.
But best-laid plans can be changed by the smallest events. When a Texas politician gathered protestors for a Dallas appearance by Lyndon Johnson just before the election, violence erupted and national cameras captured normally-genteel women spitting at the VP-candidate and his frightened wife. Horrified on-the-fence voters nationwide cast their ballots accordingly.
But “hatred” for Kennedy wasn’t limited to Dallas .
Southerners widely detested his stance on race relations. Conservatives feared his Catholicism would make him “more devoted to the Pope than to the American Constitution.” Many thought he was weak, since he seemed reluctant to utilize nuclear weapons against Russia .
Those and other issues plagued Kennedy’s time in the White House, but he was determined to run again for office. He and the Democrats knew, however, that winning Texas in the 1964 election had to start in Dallas so they sent Adlai Stevenson there in October 1963, to pave the way. But after witnessing riots and being spat upon, Stevenson “privately” questioned Kennedy’s plans to visit Dallas.
He “was very concerned about Kennedy’s safety in the city…”
In light of recent events in Washington , I found “ Dallas 1963” to be doubly interesting: deep political divisiveness; dicey overseas relations; and a president who wants social change, causing accusations of lack of concern for the country’s well-being.
But why was JFK assassinated in Dallas, of all places? Authors Bill Minutaglio and Steven L. Davis answer that question, as they take a look at the emotions, beliefs, and social mores of the times. This narrative starts in 1960 and ends with a bullet - and even though we know what happened, getting to that last point is squirmy: my heart pounded. I wanted to yell, “WATCH OUT!”
When you can immerse yourself like that in a book, it’s always a good sign – which is why I recommend this one. For fans of politics, history, or anyone desiring to somehow mark this inauspicious anniversary, “ Dallas 1963” has the ingredients for a very absorbing read.
The Bookworm is Terri Schlichenmeyer. Email her at firstname.lastname@example.org.