Current weather

  • Overcast, light rain
  • 59°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Pack attack

Game board release possible plans for wolf control program

Posted: October 23, 2011 - 7:43pm

The Alaska Board of Game last Friday released its proposed intensive management plans for moose populations that include aerial wolf control for game Unit 15A, on the upper Kenai Peninsula, and Unit 15C on the lower peninsula north of Kachemak Bay. Presented as proposals on the Nov. 11-14 Arctic Region Board of Game meeting in Barrow, Proposal 35 is the intensive management plan for Unit 15A and Proposal 36 is the plan for Unit 15C. The board could approve, modify, reject or table the plans.

The board had previously listed the proposals in its agenda as placeholder items, fulfilling the legal notice requirements. The plans released last week, called “125 plans” for the subsection of the Alaska Administrative Code that refers to intensive management plans, provide more detail and put into regulation how the plan would work.

Both plans would:
• Authorize methods of taking wolves, including hunting and trapping;
• Authorize the Commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game to issue public aerial shooting permits and land and shoot permits;
• Authorize the commissioner to allow agents of the state or department employees to do aerial, land and shoot, or ground shooting of wolves; and
• Allow aerial wolf control for five years from January 2012 to January 2017.

Unit 15A and 15C have different issues regarding moose population. In 15A, north of Tustumena Lake, the 125 Plan notes the main reason for low moose populations is declining habitat. About 80 percent of wUnit 15A is federal land in the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge, where aerial wolf hunting is prohibited. The lack of a fire more than 50,000 acres since 1940 has allowed trees and shrubs not suitable for moose to grow.

In Unit 15C, the 125 plan notes that “the moose population is currently within intensive management objectives for population size,” that is, an estimated 2,079 moose for 2010, with an average yearly harvest of 275 moose from 2001-2010. Until this year, the moose harvest has been within intensive management objectives.

This year, because of greater restrictions on bull hunts, the harvest was 29 cows and 12 bulls. ADF&G adopted those regulations because of conservation concerns over low bull-cow ratios. The bull-cow moose ratio is below harvest objectives, said Tony Kavalok, assistant director of the Division of Wildlife Conservation, Anchorage.

“The intensive management plan is going to address that,” Kavalok said.

The 125 plans also establish doing wolf surveys. One research project is to radio collar breeding cows next spring and track them and spring calves to assess calf survival rates and how calves died.

That’s similar to a study on the effect of predators on moose on the Kenai done in 1977-78 by Albert Franzmann, Charles Schwartz and Rolf Peterson. A 1980 report by those biologists showed 34 percent of the calves died had been killed by black bears, with 6 percent killed by brown bears and 6 percent killed by wolves.

“I expect we’ll find bears will be significant predators,” Kavalok said.

If approved by the Board of Game, wolf control would start in January 2012 before the wolf and predator studies are done. Kavalok said the Board of Game didn’t want to delay aerial wolf control because of public pressure to address declining moose populations.

Wolf control is easy to put in place, and because wolves are resilient, it doesn’t carry any inherent risk to the wolf population, he said.

“It sends a message to the public that we are serious about turning this around and we will do something,” Kavalok said. “Meanwhile, stand by and wait and see if bears are playing a role in this.”

Kavalok said that based on his experience with intensive management in Unit 16 across Cook Inlet, aerial wolf control will have a limited effect on the public and wilderness activity. He noted that Unit 16 includes the Iditarod Trail. Wolf control was suspended during the first two weeks of the Iditarod Sled Dog Race, he said.

“Given what we’ve seen there, I just don’t think it’s going to be a big deal,” Kavalok said.

Still to be released are two other components of intensive game management, a Feasibility Assessment and an Operations Plan. Those documents are being reviewed now by ADF&G staff and should be available in time for the Board of Game meeting, if not sooner.

Written comments on the proposals made by 5 p.m. Oct. 28 will be included in board member workbooks. Comments received after that will still be accepted up to the start of the meeting on Nov. 11. Late comments can be faxed. Include the proposal number. The Unit 15A Kenai area plan is Proposal 35 and the Unit 15C lower peninsula plan is Proposal 36 for the Unit 15C. Send comments to: Board of Game Comments, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Boards Support Section, P.O. Box 115526, Juneau AK 99811-5526, fax (907) 465-6094. Visit for more information. Copies of the two 125 plans are available at

  • Comment

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
orionsbow1 10/24/11 - 09:51 am
Poor habitat

BOG ( Board of Game) wants to increase moose in 15A,where they say the habitat is not sufficient for more moose? It does not make sense. Killing wolves to have more moose die of starvation or disease is not sound management.
BOG wants to increase the bull/cow ratio in 15C, where they say has enough moose but the wrong ratio. How does killing wolves here help that? Wolves kill only 6% of the calves. Bog is wrong on both counts

potomac 10/24/11 - 10:38 am
Poor Habitate comment

I am glad someone else reading this article came up with the same thoughts. Just because it is easiest to implement a wolf control hunt, it isn't the problem. How many times do we pay for a study so the BOG can just round file it and go about their business as usual? Maybe a better solution would be an intensive prescribed burn in both areas, shut the season down early and set some fires! Bump up the blackbear hunting, say increase the bag limit to 2 in the spring and 2 fall bears. The southern area have so much dead fall from beetle kill only a squirrel can traverse the country including the south side of Kachemak Bay, you wont see moose calving there since they can't reach their traditional caving ground through all the dead fall. Mean while the kill should point out obviously why there are few bulls, they were all dieing as spike fork duh! So BOG get it together!!

kenaicommoner 10/25/11 - 10:40 am
"not a big deal"

Wow. ADFG is taking this to a whole new level.

Mr. Kavalok may be right in that going forward with wolf control,“sends a message to the public that we are serious about turning this around and we will do something,” However, the "public" that will likley be ignored in the decision is the very large portion who believe that what they want to do is just plain wrong. The reasons it's wrong are numerous and don't need to be repeated here.

I also think Kavalok is WAY off in saying, "I just don’t think it’s going to be a big deal" based on the minimal effect predator control has had on public use and wilderness activity in unit 16. Talk about comparing apples to oranges! How can you compare a sled dog race closure for two weeks in a remote and nearly inaccessible location to the affect and visibility an aerial wolf control program would have in a heavily traveled, roaded, populated, well known, skiing, snowmachining, hiking, canoeing, fishing, wildlife viewing, year round tourist destination immediately adjacent to the city of Anchorage?

ADFG has their heads in a place that doesn't allow them to recongize anything but solving management problems the ol' fashioned way. In a way that is heaped on us by a small minority of the public who believe killing predators is always an appropriate means of improving their ability to get "their moose." Even if that minority of society apparently has no understanding of biology and really doesn't understand the meaning and purposes of wildlife management.

It's time to end this before it gets started. Wolves didn't cause the problems on the Kenai. Killing them in hopes of improving moose conditions is an inappropriate solution in an even more inappropriate location.

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback