Current weather

  • Overcast, light rain
  • 54°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Jerzy Shedlock
Defendant Lyle Ludvick answers questions Monday from his attorney, Michael Moberly, at the Kenai Courthouse. Ludvick was sentenced to seven years in prison.

Ludvick gets seven years for 2010 shooting

Posted: August 14, 2012 - 8:35am  |  Updated: August 14, 2012 - 5:33pm

Lyle Ludvick was sentenced Monday at the Kenai Courthouse to seven years in prison for a single charge of manslaughter. 

On July 16, 2010, Ludvick, 44, of Soldotna, shot 23-year-old Brendan McGee in the head with a shotgun at close range over a $500 payment for a gun, according to state prosecutors. 

McGee’s mother, Carolyn, exited the courtroom shortly after the sentencing began. She cried as she walked out of the courthouse. She did not see Ludvick’s own tears as he asked for forgiveness from her family. 

The prosecution argued Ludvick brought the gun on the property, at minimum, to provoke the victim and highlighted past criminal offenses. Defense attorney Michael Moberly focused his argument on the disputed details surrounding the shooting and crime scene. Ludvick’s family attended the sentencing, and no one spoke on McGee’s behalf expect District Attorney Scot Leaders, who read Carolyn’s prepared statement in her absence. 

Superior Court Judge Charles Huguelet’s sentence comes after more than two years of hearings. Ludvick’s original charges included two counts of second-degree murder, first-degree burglary, third-degree assault and tampering with physical evidence. The defense negotiated a plea agreement in January, and the state dropped the aforementioned charges.

Moberly attempted to argue an additional mitigator during the sentencing. He played a recording of Thomas Mason, witness to the murder and friend of McGee’s, answering Alaska State Troopers’ questions. Mason’s responses were recorded shortly after troopers arrived on scene following the shooting. 

Mason is distressed during the recording, and he tells troopers, “I don’t know why Brendan jumped up at him. I don’t know what he intended to do. 

“He looked like he (messed) up … I don’t think he came intending to shoot Brendan.”

Using the recording, Moberly argued his client reacted due to the victim’s spontaneous motion. His client was not hovering over McGee, as the state’s report indicted, but they were in close quarters, Moberly said. 

“The provocation explains the reaction,” Moberly said. 

Ludvick wiped sweat from his hands and brow as his defense attorney detailed their version of events. 

Huguelet then asked if any past confrontations occurred between Ludvick and McGee. No tension existed, and Ludvick gave McGee a firearm for bear and personal protection, as the victim was indebted to some people, Moberly said. The defense attorney questioned his client about who provoked the argument to its heightened state and where exactly the shooting took place. 

Ludvick said he brought his gun for bear protection. He unintentionally discharged the shotgun, he continued, when he turned around to investigate a rustling in some nearby bushes and returned to face McGee, who leapt in his direction. 

He also said he stood outside the door at a distance of about 15 feet. Moberly corrected his client. There is a factual dispute, Moberly said, about whether the shooting occurred in a cabin, or whether Ludvick shot from outside the door of the cabin. 

Before submitting the state’s proposed sentence, Leaders read Carolyn’s victim impact statement. 

“‘I hope (Ludvick) is haunted everyday for shooting my son,’” Leaders read. 

McGee’s brother and sister did not write their own statements, Carolyn believes, because they are unable to cope with their brother’s death, the note continued.

Leaders said the plea agreement was an appropriate resolution, asking for 11 years with four suspended, along with 10 years probation. 

He did not agree with the story about Ludvick arming himself for bear protection. The defendant armed himself for the dispute, Leaders said. 

“Certainly, he was reckless, if not knowing, that the pulling of the trigger pointed at the young man’s face would kill (McGee),” Leaders said. 

Damage was consolidated to McGee’s jaw and face, he added. 

A jury trial could have gone either way, both parties and Judge Huguelet agreed. The defendant would clearly have been identified as Ludvick. Mason pointed out Ludvick in a photo lineup with absolute certainty, Leaders said, and the first time he did so “it made him sick to his stomach.” Rather, the dispute would have centered on choosing appropriate charges. 

The defense contended the incident would not have happened if not for McGee’s aggressive nature and substance abuse history, but it failed to mention Ludvick’s own propensity toward physical aggression, Leaders said. 

The district attorney outlined Ludvick’s previous run-ins with the law; one of those incidents included hitting his son in the head with a firearm. But Ludvick was never convicted for any of the violent offenses. He was charged, however, with three DUIs during a short period of time. He also was struggling with his own substance abuse around the time of the shooting. 

Substance abuse and anger management programs are appropriate, Leaders said. 

Moberly said the prosecution’s argument was full of holes. 

From day one, Ludvick wanted to tell his side of the story and let the McGee family know the shooting was accidental, he said. Moberly also questioned the state’s use of past offenses, stating the prosecution was “casting stones about 20-year-old offenses.”

Ludvick spoke at the sentencing — first to McGee’s family and then directly to the court. 

He said he wanted the McGees to know what happened and how he felt about it. 

“I’m very, very sorry and full of grief and remorse,” he said. “I spent many nights crying. I’m crying with you and for you. Please, hear my heart. It was an accident.”

He once more said the shotgun discharged by accident. 

He would never again be a problem to anyone, anywhere, he added while addressing Huguelet. 

Jerzy Shedlock can be reached at 

  • Comment

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Norseman 08/15/12 - 07:19 am
7 years?

What a joke our justice system is. Man goes and blows the head off of someone with a shotgun and gets 7 years?

This murderer should have gotten life.

kenai123 08/15/12 - 01:15 pm
It was an accident?

It was an accident? An accident is when you are walking behind another guy while hunting and your gun accidently goes off. An accident is when your were joking around with your buddy and the gun goes off when you thought it was unloaded. It is not an accident when you are in a disagreement with someone over a couple dollars and all of a sudden the other guys ends up with his head blowed off. They must of left a lot out of this story because all it says is that Ludvick and Mason went out and decided to blow a guys head off over $500 and then lie about it as if it were some kind of accident. These guys must really have some inside connections within the courts because if a normal person did something like this they would have gone away for life. The story makes no sense, at first Ludvick is just holding a shotgun on McGee, for no reason, then all of a sudden McGee lunges at Ludvick, for no reason, and then the gun goes off, for no reason. The whole story stinks of conspiracy and murder, for no reason! What is wrong with our courts? Our courts spend millions of dollars and huge resources prosecuting people for the dumbest stuff and when it comes to removing people, crazy people who point guns and others, for no reason; our courts do next to nothing. Ludvick just blasts the guy, for no reason, and then cries "oh I'm so sorry! You all just gots to believe me!" so the courts just slap him on the wrists with "naughty, naughty! Seven years!" People get more time for growing pot or for fish and game violations.! Either this story is lacking or our courts have gone totally nuts!

akresident 08/16/12 - 08:44 am

Agreed. What a travesty. Bringing a shotgun to confront about a debt, pointing it at his head but he didnt plan to kill him? I disagree a jury trial wouldve gone either way. People are not stupid.

c.udvick 11/07/12 - 12:56 am
lyle ludvick

he that is without sin cast the first stone. this man is my father he is not a bad man he wants more than ever to take back what he has done it was horrible yes but an accident none the less, i am the same age today as that young man and would never wish the pain of loosing a child on anyone so why would someone want to wish life on my father. i know him better than anyone you all no not of what you speak. two familys were broken from this not just one put yourself in our position. my sincerest apology to your lose.

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback