Current weather

  • Broken clouds
  • 66°
    Broken clouds
  • Comment

Endeavour operator fired for 'non-performance'

Posted: December 14, 2012 - 7:02pm  |  Updated: December 15, 2012 - 9:01pm
The Buccaneer jack-up rig Endeavour-Spirt of Independence rises in front of Poot Peak across Kachemak Bay.  Photo by Michael Armstrong; Homer News
Photo by Michael Armstrong; Homer News
The Buccaneer jack-up rig Endeavour-Spirt of Independence rises in front of Poot Peak across Kachemak Bay.

Buccaneer Energy fired the company charged with operating the $100 million Endeavour-Spirit of Independence jack-up rig after watching it sit in Homer delayed for months, miss the summer drilling window and rack up a large bill in harbor fees.

Jay Morakis of JMR Worldwide, Buccaneer’s public relations office, said Buccaneer officials decided to sever ties with Archer Drilling Company on Thursday after hearing the company was not paying local subcontractors for work on the rig and for “non-performance.”

Buccaneer is a partner with, and the manager of Kenai Offshore Ventures — a joint venture project that owns the Endeavour with Ezion Holdings and the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority. Morakis said Buccaneer acted in the best interest of the partnership.

“The issue is for work performance between KOV and Archer,” he said.

Calls and emails placed to Archer Drilling seeking comment were not returned as of press time.

Morakis said the dispute should not “in any way impede the timeline of the rig at all.” On Friday afternoon Morakis said Kenai Offshore Ventures had entered into a letter of intent with Spartan Offshore Drilling to take over operating the Endeavour.

In a release through Morakis, Paul Butler, president and CEO of Spartan Offshore, said the company expects contracts to be signed in the next few days.

“I think our experience operating the Spartan 151 in the Cook Inlet over the last 18 months makes us uniquely qualified to take on this challenge and we look forward to a very active 2013,” Butler said in the release.

In a late Friday statement, Karsten Rodvik, AIDEA Spokesman, wrote that the group was aware of the situation and that its “first concern and main priority is for Alaska workers and businesses to be promptly paid.”

“We are pleased that our partners are responding quickly and responsibly, and we are confident in their ability to resolve this matter as soon as possible,” Rodvik wrote in an email. “AIDEA will continue to monitor the situation during this transition process, to assure that obligations are met.”

Initial rumors that Archer had first walked away from the rig because they could not pay their local contractors as a result of a billing dispute with Buccaneer did “not surprise” Morakis, he said.

However, Morakis said KOV and Buccaneer consider themselves “paid in full” to Archer “with the exception of some disputed amounts for work that has been done.” Morakis could not provide details on that debt.

Buccaneer will work to make sure Homer-based contractors and others who worked on the rig who are owed money by Archer are paid for their services, Morakis said.

In early April, three Kenai-based contractors testified to the Kenai City Council that they and other area contractors had not received timely payment from Buccaneer for work at its Kenai Loop gas field, according to meeting minutes.

Mitch Mahurin, operations manager for Inlet Drilling Alaska in Kenai, said Buccaneer was late on payments to his company. Inlet Drilling was eventually paid in full for the work they performed, Mahurin said, but the company is not currently doing business with Buccaneer.

“Hopefully Buccaneer has realized that non-payment to the contractors is not acceptable and that’s what made their decision to get rid of Archer easier,” he said.

Mahurin said he can “clearly” sympathize with Homer workers who were not paid by Archer.

“In this industry you have pretty high invoices that come in and we have to pay our employees regardless of if we have gotten paid on those invoices or not,” he said. “It is certainly disheartening coming from a small company when no payments are being made.”

Morakis said what happened in April with delayed payments to Kenai contractors is “totally different” than the current situation. At that time, Morakis said the company had “a short-term liquidity issue because its primary lender literally left the market.”

Homer Port Director and Harbormaster Bryan Hawkins said he watched an exodus of workers loading up and leaving the rig, which he described as “a little bit depressing and definitely concerning.”

Hawkins said Archer called to inform him they were pulling workers off the rig because they “no longer have a contract” with Buccaneer. However, when Hawkins asked for details, Archer wouldn’t elaborate, he said.

“There is still a skeleton crew on board making sure that the rig is safe and warm making sure we don’t have any damage due to the freezing conditions and things like that,” he said.

Hawkins estimated about 50 construction workers, pipefitters, welders and other contractors were employed on the rig. He said he hoped they would be put back to work — likely many of those same people who left — sooner rather than later.

“There’s only so many qualified people,” he said with a laugh.

Homer City Manager Walt Wrede said the announcement got the city’s attention and prompted a Friday morning teleconference with Buccaneer officials. Wrede said he had initial concerns about the status of those rig workers and who would be left to look after a giant piece of infrastructure the city had no way of moving otherwise.

“They seemed very, very motivated to make sure all the contractors got paid,” he said, adding the city was assured they would be paid for outstanding harbor fees.

Wrede said he came away from the conference feeling it was just a “short term shake-up.” He said the rig’s prolonged presence had not turned away any commerce at the port and that the city was, for the most part, happy for the additional business it has brought in.

“It is usually a slow time of year here in Homer so it was good to have hotels filled and restaurants filled and people getting a paycheck,” he said.

Wrede said he encouraged Buccaneer officials to get busy drilling for gas in light of recent news of looming area shortages. Hawkins echoed a similar sentiment.

“The reality is that we have a rig and it is right there and all of us have an interest in seeing that it is successful in its venture, which is to bring more gas online,” Hawkins said. “Sometimes I find that some things just come harder than others. I don’t know why, but they just do.”

Brian Smith can be reached at

  • Comment

Comments (6) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
spwright 12/16/12 - 09:59 am

Sun. 12/15/12

How about We fire some State Legistlators for NON-PERFORMANCE for 30 years or more & the Natural Gas PipeLine ?
Oh lets do some more Research & assign yet another committee & Talk, Talk, then Talk some more.


kksalm 12/16/12 - 03:33 pm
Archer employee bar talk

From two separate encounters word on the street is......
Buccaneer is not paying Archer . Sounds familiar. There's something sleazy about their whole Kenai presence but that's just from what I hear, what I read, in other words, IMO. They must not operate under the concept of certified payroll where wages are guaranteed. The city should make that happen when Buccaneer comes, hat in hand, for another consideration. What company figures they can just show up and start work without going through standards already accepted by their Alaskan peers? Just sayin', just asking'.
Have a nice day.

Sam Von Pufendorf
Sam Von Pufendorf 12/17/12 - 05:52 am

spw, how much money did the state of Alaska invest in the oil pipeline?
Had we built a parallel gas pipeline at the time the oil pipeline was constructed, our current state savings account would be much smaller since the gas was used for EOR (enhanced oil recovery) in the for of miscible injectant and maintaining the gas cap to keep the oil formation pressurized.
The reason a gas pipeline is currently not being built is because it simply will not reap the returns necessary to pay for the cost of the infratructure needed to deliver the gas. At the current spot market (roughly $3.90 a mm/btu) the return on investment would be marginal at best. Add to that the fact the lower 48 will be a net exporter of gas before the end of this decade and you have an economic conumdrum.
The best option currently available is exporting our natural gas as LNG and the market is currently flooded. Invitations to industry such as Agrium and Dupont would halp the feasiblity, but the ever changing tax code makes it less appealing to industry.

spwright 12/17/12 - 09:08 am
Lame 12/17/12

S V P All of your responses seem reasonable to Us Alaskans that have Natural Gas to Heat Our Homes.
We are Warm & Cozy at- 25 below zero.

But to many other Alaskans those reasons are really Lame.

Talk with your fellow Alaskans that live in Fairbanks & cost over $1,200 per month for Heating Oil. Talk with our fellow Alaskans that Live in the Bush & are tearing down vacant buildings & use those materials to burn & heat their homes.
To those Alaskans, this is a Real Emergency.

Non-Peformance by Our Elected Leaders & the Oil Industry
for over 40 years is Why we do NOT have a Natural Gas PipeLine.

Merry Christmas to You & Yours . Give Your Kids & Grand Kids a great big Grizzly Bear Hug today.


Sam Von Pufendorf
Sam Von Pufendorf 12/17/12 - 05:36 pm
Reasonable to assume!

I happen to work with several people from Fairbanks and have family there. No one complains as they chose to live there for one reason or another.
If we were to have built a pipeline for gas at the inception of the field, it is safe to assume that the oil recovery rate would have dropped by 1/3 due to blowing down the gas cap and depleting EOR capabilities.
It seems to me that in the 50's and 60's, if we Alaskans gave two hoots about the comfort of our fellow Alaskans, we would have built a gas pipeline then, from Cook Inlet to Fairbanks and parts in between. But instead we sold it to Colliers and Phillips to create jobs for people to ba able to purchase natural gas for their homes.
If you are suggesting building a gas pipeline to every bush community in Alaska you have absolutely no sense of how capitalism and economics works.
I lived on an island in Prince William Sound. We had only the electricity our diesel generator produced and heat from a wood stove. Did we complain? Why? We chose to live there! Those hardships and expenses were expected. The hardships got old and I moved to the mainland! Problem solved!
I too would like to supply cheap energy to the entire state, but it's not logical economically. People move for a reason. I am assuming you moved here from parts unknown and out of state. There was a reason for it ... better job ... better pay ... a better place to live! Peoples feet aren't nailed to the streets of Fairbanks or Bethel.

beaverlooper 12/18/12 - 07:03 pm
The reason that a pipeline

The reason that a pipeline wasn't built to Fairbanks in the 50s or 60 is simple, you said it your self....Economics.Before the 70's embargo ,gas and heating oil were pennies per gallon,it made no economic sense.
The state of Alaska sold ABSOLUTELY NO GAS to Phillips or Colliers,we took our royalty and were ecstatic to have it.
Colliers was of the very few value added industries in Alaska,EVER,that made money The state didn't put up a dime.Colliers got their gas from Unocal I believe ,who paid us for the right to develop it.Phillips and Marathon paid us for the right developed that gas and sold it to Japan for WAY more money than the going price here.....Economics.
The state at that time was not rich.No north slope ,no permanent fund, they just wanted money in the coffers.....Economics.

"I happen to work with several people from Fairbanks and have family there. No one complains " you must have some rich family and friends ,I hear people from Fairbanks crying the blues over energy prices all the time.Heck they're talking about banning wood stoves there because it's so smokey when it's cold..
One thing though,even if a pipeline is built ,that won't necessarily equate to gas at the prices we are used to.....Economics.

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback