Current weather

  • Overcast
  • 37°
    Overcast
  • Comment

Kenai comp. plan approved

Borough now to have final say

Posted: April 18, 2013 - 9:16pm

Kenai City Council finalized and approved its comprehensive plan following an about three-hour discussion on its amendments at a Wednesday night council meeting. Now the plan is headed for the Kenai Peninsula Borough for final approval.

The council voted on more than 20 amendments concerning land use classification and how to facilitate greater public input when updating its comprehensive plan in the future, among other topics. Nearly all the amendments came from council members Bob Molloy and Mike Boyle.

Molloy pitched five amendments to reclassify proposed Mixed Use and Industrial land uses along the Kenai Spur Highway, Kalifornsky Beach Road and four plots of land near the Kenai Municipal Airport.

Molloy said they were an effort to preserve the buffers between residential neighborhoods and future or existing development.

Boyle agreed that was important.

“We’ve had this discussion before,” Boyle said. “There was a referendum, and it’s the wishes of the public and the people in the voting booths.”

But the amendments met little support.

Molloy motioned to change the Mixed Use land classification to Rural Residential on all properties zoned residential between Bow Picker Lane and Ketch Street, along the K-Beach Road corridor.

In another motion he proposed reclassifying a plot that boarders the Spur Highway from Mixed Use land use classification to Parks, Recreation and Open Space. The portion of the plot is between Beluga Drive West and the Spur Highway.

He motioned also to change other plots along the Spur Highway, currently zoned residential and recreational, from Mixed Use land use classification to Suburban Residential. The plots start at the intersection of Forrest Drive and run north to Redoubt Drive. His motion only includes the plots labeled Mixed Use in that area.

Another motion would have changed two plots west of the airport — tracts B and D — from Industrial to Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces, but it failed.

The other three motions failed, too.

“Those two corners are perfect for development,” Council Member Tim Navarre said about the two Mixed Use corner plots abutting Redoubt Drive and Evergreen Street.

About the plot between Beluga Drive West and the Spur Highway, Mayor Pat Porter said the airport owns the land. Porter said the city would either need to buy or lease the land if it wishes to reclassify its land use.

“That land is how the airport makes its money,” Porter said.

But the land is already open space, Boyle said. Reclassifying it would only “change the vision of what to do with it,” he said. Buying it is a “moot point,” he said.

The only amendment of the five that passed, against a single objection from Navarre, reclassified two parcels west of the airport as Parks, Recreation and Open Spaces. The city-owned parcels — tracts A and C — were previously partially classified as industrial.

One of Boyle’s amendments proposed changing the land use classification in the area of the MAPS subdivision — Magic and Aliak Drive, Princess Street, and the Kenai Spur Highway. He motioned to change the properties in that area from Suburban Residential land use classification to Rural Residential.

Molloy said the residents of the subdivision have fought that for years.

“When you’re looking to the future, you can’t forget the lessons of the past,” he said.

But the amendment failed 5-2, with Boyle and Molloy voting for its passage.

Porter said the MAPS subdivision has water, sewer and paved roads. Rural Residential is no longer a suitable fit, she said.

City Planner Marilyn Kebschull referenced the plan’s Rural Residential land use definitions. According to the definition, “homes in this district typically rely on individual on-site water supply and wastewater disposal systems” and “streets typically are gravel.”

City Manager Rick Koch said that is not the case with the subdivision. “The flavor of that area has changed over the last 20 years,” Koch said.

But MAPS subdivision resident Don Wright said that is wrong. He said many roads are only partially paved, or not at all. Another MAPS subdivision resident, Mark Schrag, agreed.

Boyle motioned also to add developing a public campground as a high priority to the plan.

After the council amended the wording of the motion to “investigate and consider” developing a public campground, the motion passed unanimously.

Council member Terry Bookey proposed the amendment to Boyle’s motion. Boyle and Molloy were the only council members who voted for the original motion.

Navarre said he did not support the original motion because the city likely does not have the funding to build a public campground.

“I’m starting to get concerned about how we’re starting to put wish lists into the comp plan,” he said.

Bookey, however, supported the park’s development. The city used to have a public park, he said, but “we now have a shopping center there.”

“It’s unfathomable to me that we don’t have one,” he said. “People come from all over the world to come here and we don’t have a campground.”

Funding may be an issue, he said, but developing another park is important.

Once council voted on the amendments, Molloy motioned to postpone approval of the plan. Boyle seconded the motion.

Molloy said he wanted administration to prepare a completed table of all the amendments for the council to review at its next meeting. It would also allow the public more time to comment on the plan, he said.

Bookey disagreed. The council voted it down 5-2. Molloy and Boyle voted in favor of the postponement.

“With another two weeks, I suppose, someone could come up with amendments,” Bookey said. But how many more weeks can the city keep “this wound open?” he said.

The city has solicited public input since mid-September. It has collected 152 public comments, held 24 public work sessions, distributed two newsletters and various public notices and two community surveys.

Residents, however, have said they would like more time to critique the plan.

Boyle acknowledged the city’s planning and zoning commission, administration and council invested a lot of time into the plan, but he has “great reservations” with the document, he said.

“I would have preferred to have another couple of weeks to look at it,” he said.

He said the public has failed to grasp that the document is revised annually. He said also there has been a lack of discussion for developing a city center, and the “urban sprawl” suggested in changes to land use along the Kenai Spur Highway bother him.

There has been a lot of public input, he said, and “in my heart, I feel that we’ve ignored that.”

The council voted 6-1 to pass the comprehensive plan. Boyle voted against it.

Dan Schwartz can be reached at daniel.schwartz@peninsulaclarion.com.

  • Comment

Comments (2)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
granny
160
Points
granny 04/19/13 - 11:04 pm
1
1

WOW!!!

Somewhere around 50 amendments dealt with over the last two meetings (no public comments were taken this last meeting) and then right to a vote. No further chance, well maybe!, for the public to comment on any changes. What are you afraid of council? Some of us have been working hard on this for years, and you all can't even handle a couple months?! Councilman Marquis said something to the effect of, "this thing has run it's course, it's time to move on."

Well, maybe not. I have filed a petition to put the matter on the next municipal ballot. Let's let the residents of Kenai decide whether they prefer the proposed comprehensive plan or the currant plan. Let the voters decide if they are satisfied with the changes the council made.

See if people have changed their minds about the commercialization of Spur Highway. The information gathered by the consultants didn't indicate such a change.

I really don't like the change for my neighborhood. We are zoned RR1 (rural residential 1). We fought a bruising battle with Planning and Zoning to keep our neighborhood purely residential while allowing for professional offices along the highway. The new plan suggests our neighborhood be changed to RS (suburban residential). Reading from the city's land-use table here are some of the entities allowed in the RS zone under a conditional use permit: Banks,Business/consumer Services, Guide Services,Hotels/Motels,Lodges,Restrautants,Retail Business,Wholesale Business,Theaters/Commercial Recreation, and a slew of misc. land uses including "Personal Services"(!!!).

The above is actually true for all residential zones except RR1 because we worked way harder than we ever should have had to clear those possibilities out of our neighborhood. So if someone tells you the council listened to our concerns, they are either lying or they have been mislead! Just thinking of how disrespectful some in this council have been of all the work done to keep the residential character of our neighborhood in tact motivates me to keep fighting city hall.

It's certainly true "you can't fight city hall" on their own turf, but out on the streets we have beat them and hopefully they can be beat again. Stay tuned!!

We need a little over 200 signatures on our petition over the next few weeks to get on the ballot, so any help would be appreciated. Mark Schrag

kksalm
212
Points
kksalm 04/21/13 - 09:40 am
1
1

I agree with WOW!!! it's a crock

What a crock of ____!
It doesn't matter what you think, the mayor and her minions (A minion is a follower devoted to serve his/her master relentlessly) have decided what is good for you.
The only people endorsing what the mayor's hand picked planning and zoning people saying ,"yes this is good!" was the planning and zoning people themselves.
Essentially they represented themselves as Kenai citizens endorsing what they, themselves, had recommended. To go in front of the council and say they support their own findings just seems wrong.
Isn't this some kind of ethics violation? It's pathetic that we stand by and roll over for what the elected and elected's appointees shovel down our throats.
You have to have followed the series of events since the last mayoral election to fully understand the implications of what is now occuring in our fair city. Unfortunately we are destined to become corporate, not community.
Have a wonderful day!

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321268/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321253/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321248/
  • title http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321243/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321208/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/320593/
  • title http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321173/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321163/
My Gallery

CONTACT US

  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING

MORRIS ALASKA NEWS