Current weather

  • Overcast, light rain
  • 57°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Energy upgrade loan program gets no takers

Posted: September 11, 2013 - 2:23pm  |  Updated: September 11, 2013 - 10:16pm

JUNEAU (AP) — A loan program designed to help cover energy upgrades to schools and other public buildings has gotten no takers even as school districts struggle with energy costs.

The state spends $100 million each year on school district utility costs. In 2010, the Legislature created a loan program to help bring down the costs, with the loan to be repaid with money saved on heating fuel.

The Alaska Housing Finance Corp., or AHFC, which manages the program, can issue up to $250 million in loans to districts, boroughs, municipalities and the university system, but so far, none have taken advantage of the program, APRN reported Monday.

Eric Havelock, who administers the program, said the agency has gotten lots of calls and some basic questions but only received two applications from the cities of Kenai and Seward, and neither went through with a loan.

Under the program, if a public entity wants an energy upgrade, it would get a building audit where a contractor would guarantee a certain percentage of energy savings. AHFC would then provide a loan to cover the cost of the audit and any retrofitting.

After upgrades are made, the building owner repays the loan with money that otherwise would have gone toward heat and electricity. When the loan is repaid, energy savings could be put elsewhere.

If the promised savings don't materialize, AHFC CEO Bryan Butcher said, the contractor would be on the hook for the difference.

He said the idea behind the program was to bring the same benefits to public buildings as AHFC offered for residential buildings. Private property owners have turned to AHFC for other energy efficiency programs.

Butcher said AHFC has advertised the loan program for public buildings and is looking at reasons why school districts aren't interested.

Bruce Johnson, head of the Alaska Council of School Administrators, said it comes down to who can make long-term commitments about budgeting. Districts budget for one year ahead, making committing to a loan of five years or more difficult. That would leave the decision for an energy efficiency loan up to the state or local governments that own school buildings.

Johnson said districts in the past also have had success getting state grants to cover energy upgrades.

However, Johnson said there may be renewed interest in the program with the state looking at limiting spending amid declining oil production. He said energy upgrades will be discussed at the Alaska Council of School Administrators' conference this month.

  • Comment

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
JohnPeterZenger 09/11/13 - 09:39 pm
Unfortunately, on two fronts, it's very simple

The terms of these loans put a contractor on the hook to perform to their own standards which the terms say they are supposed to guarantee.

No wonder there's no takers, a building contractor in Alaska that will actually stand behind their word is a very rare bird indeed.

As to 'limited' future spending, can thank Parnell and the oiled legislators for giving that education money to the oil corporations.

We could afford to maintain and upgrade our schools through direct funding, but instead Parnell and the oiled legislators decided we should give at least a billion dollars a year to their corporate masters.

We could better afford to fix our roads and bridges, upgrade and build schools, provide our citizens with better healthcare, etc, etc, etc, ....but we are giving the money to the oil corporations.

The only reason we are looking at decreasing spending in the immediate future is because Parnell and the oiled legislators decided we should give that money to the oil corporations. No strings attached.

But that's not the worst of it.

The worst of it is that there are some few Alaska residents who still actually think Parnell and the oiled legislators have their best interests in mind. These deluded souls would voluntarily opt to have Parnell and those oiled legislators defraud them over and over and over again.

robert white
robert white 09/12/13 - 03:11 am

I would suggest that you get off your know it all rusty dusty and run for office. Your tax till they drop attitude reeks of a person whose punched a time clock their whole life and lacks any common sense toward increasing jobs.

JohnPeterZenger 09/12/13 - 08:50 am
You're not paying attention, robert

Context is everything, and you're without context.

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback