Current weather

  • Overcast
  • 57°
  • Comment

Fisheries panel brings fishers from all user groups to the table

Posted: January 22, 2014 - 11:38pm  |  Updated: January 28, 2014 - 4:08pm
Back | Next
Photo by Rashah McChesney/Peninsula Clarion  Jim Butler, commercial setnetter and representative of the Kenai Peninsula Fishermen's Association looks out over a crowd of more than 130 people during a fisheries panel and chamber luncheon Wednesday Jan. 22, 2014 at the Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Center in Kenai, Alaska.
Photo by Rashah McChesney/Peninsula Clarion Jim Butler, commercial setnetter and representative of the Kenai Peninsula Fishermen's Association looks out over a crowd of more than 130 people during a fisheries panel and chamber luncheon Wednesday Jan. 22, 2014 at the Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Center in Kenai, Alaska.

Editor's note: This article has been revised to add a word missing from Ricky Gease's last quote about the Kenai River Sport Fishing Association's policy on taking stand's on ballot issues.  

More than 130 people had lunch together at the Kenai Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Center where a panel of representatives from many of the fishing groups in the Cook Inlet answered questions on the ongoing conflict over fishing.

Six panelists answered prepared questions about the history of the fishery, problems with management and potential solutions to coping with the decline in king salmon.

The first question asked of the panelists, many of whom are fishermen in the area, was how changes in participation in Cook Inlet fisheries had affected user groups.

Jim Butler, a commercial setnet fishermen and representative of the Kenai Peninsula Fishermen’s Association, said commercial fishing had been limited, but other types of fishing had not.

“(Commercial) fisheries became limited entry in the mid-70s and as a result of that, it limited the number of people who could actually participate in our fisheries,” he said. “But no such limits exist in the river although it’s a much smaller space.”

Paul Dale, owner of Snug Harbor Seafoods and representative from the Alaska Salmon Alliance, said the commercial seafood industry had gotten better over the last few years.

“We went through a rough period of low prices and consequent business consolidation ... now markets are more varied than they used to be, all of the local seafood companies are now doing a great deal of business out of the Prince William Sound and the Gulf of Alaska,” he said.

Josh Hayes, a representative from the Kenai River Professional Guide Association said business had not been going well for guides.

Angler effort on the Kenai River is 70 percent of what it was in 2007 and 111 guide services have closed since that time, he said.

When asked about problems that detract from management in the Upper Cook Inlet fisheries, several spoke of ongoing conflict between fishing groups.

“I would say without a doubt, it’s the heightened conflict, the so-called ‘Fish Wars.’ It’s in our way,” Dale said. “It fouls research priorities, it fouls managers’ ability to do the best they can in a difficult situation. It’s out of control. I feel as though I have been participating in a relatively broken process and it is becoming more apparent that as the margins get slimmer that we need to do this job better.”

The group was asked to discuss how growth in area fisheries is affecting existing user groups.

Some spoke of the fisheries being “fully allocated” meaning that any fish stocks that are available have already been designated for a percentage of use between the sport, personal use and commercial fisheries.

If any one group continues to grow and harvest more fish, it would be taking fish away from another user group.

“I think the thing that we’re always challenged to do is to realize that one of those allocations is the fish themselves,” said Ricky Gease, executive director and representative of the Kenai River Sportfishing Association. “We need to meet minimum escapements and that is the overall challenge that I see ... is to manage expectations and to say, in times of low abundance for whatever fish it is, it is our responsibility to slow down our harvest.”

The Alaska Fisheries Conservation Alliance, a group that gained recent notoriety with a proposed statewide initiative to ban setnetting, declined to attend the meeting — the group held a press conference in Anchorage Wednesday to announce an appeal on its initiative which was rejected by Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell in early January.

While no AFCA members were in attendance at the fisheries panel, the group, its mission and the initiative were mentioned several times by local fishermen.

Kramer said the initiative detracted from recent efforts at cooperation between commercial, sport and personal use fishing interests.

“This is more of an allocation advantage ... (it) had nothing to do with conservation,” he said. “More importantly it crossed a line that made it more difficult to foster a level of cooperation and respect so we can all get together and resolve fishery issues.”

The last question to panel members was about what they would do if afforded the status of “king for the day” and could use their power to change one thing in the Cook Inlet fisheries to resolve some of the longstanding issues.

Dale said if he were king he would want to see Gease “decide to use his considerable political influence and the strength of his organization to put an end to the setnetter ban which would immediately foreclose investments and jobs to 500 or more local families. It will put them out of business, it will destroy these people financially, it is not rooted at all in sustainability or conservation.”

Butler said if he were king he would dismiss the initiative “with prejudice.”

After the meeting, Gease said he had no sway over the AFCA or its initiative in his capacity at the Kenai River Sportfishing Association.

“It is not our initiative, we are independent of each other,” Gease said.

Gease, and other members of the Kenai River Sportfishing Association did sign on as sponsors of the petition, according to the initiative documentation filed with the Lieutentant Governor’s office, however Gease said he did so as a way to support the initiative getting onto the ballot and not necessarily in support of its mission to ban setnetting in the Cook Inlet.

The signature was also not meant to represent the views of the Kenai River Sportfishing Association, he said.

“(The Kenai River Sportfishing Association) has a longstanding policy of not taking public stances on ballot issues,” he said.

After the panel finished answer its questions, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, commended the group on their willingness to talk to one another. In her experience, she said, competing user groups in other parts of the state are less willing to communicate with one another.

“Typically they would choose to just bury it and not talk about it publicly and the fighting continues and it becomes more difficult,” she said. “So you’ve taken the first step today in a very public forum.”


Reach Rashah McChesney at

  • Comment

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
KenaiKardinal88 01/23/14 - 03:32 pm
Average Alaskan Sportfisher Gets Nothing

Isn't it funny how no one group represents the average Alaskan.

The Commercial Fishing Thugs dominate every political angle.

This past summer, the commie fishers and their ADF&G frauds stuck it to the average Alaskan.

I wish set netters would get shut down state wide. Fish interceptors, placed in the streams would harvest the fish and put the revenue state bank account - not a bunch of greedy commie fishers who live outside of Alaska most of the year.

Raoulduke 01/23/14 - 08:10 pm

KK88 -Would you define your term "COMMIE FISHERS",or have you forgotten the meaning of the term? You have folks on the edge of their chairs.Just waiting to know the answer

Unglued 01/24/14 - 11:42 am
Geasy's comment at the meeting

The Kenai River Sportfishing Association has a longstanding policy of not taking public stances on issues? What does he call what KRSA does on a daily basis, and especially at Board of Fisheries meetings?

KRSA 01/25/14 - 07:34 pm
KRSA board policy

To clarify, KRSA is a 501 c 3 non-profit. 501 c 3 non-profits are barred by IRS regulations from participating in political campaigns.

KRSA has a longstanding policy of also not participating on other issues that can appear on the ballot, such as ballot initiatives and ballot referendums.

Unglued 01/26/14 - 11:55 am
Geasy's response

Oh, well then, that clarifies everything. KRSA doesn't take a public stance on political campaigns, ballot initiatives and ballot referendums, but does take a stance on public issues. Fact is, KRSA is up to its collective neck in politics, so long as the politics don't endanger it's non-profit status. Otherwise, how could it submit allocative proposals to the Board of Fisheries and then lobby board members regarding what obviously are public issues?

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback