Current weather

  • Overcast
  • 57°
  • Comment

Efforts prepare K-Beach area for future flooding

Posted: August 23, 2014 - 8:25pm  |  Updated: August 23, 2014 - 8:30pm

About 10 months after the declared Kalifornsky Beach Road flood disaster, affected property owners gathered Tuesday at the Donald E. Gilman River Center to listen to officials from involved agencies about the event.

State and Kenai Peninsula Borough staff who have been involved in the issue presented to the audience and held a discussion period in an effort to answer questions that primarily centered on drainage and concerns about future flooding.

With residents concerned about future severe flooding, officials said if another flood event occurs, the area will be better prepared, due to the work that has been done.

“In the event that we have this happen again, and, according to the hydrologist, it is going to happen again in the future, the same process will apply,” said Scott Walden, Borough Office of Emergency Management director. “If it’s groundwater, we’ll have everything ready.”

The roadwork that has been done with culvert installation, ditching and restoration, will likely help in a future event, Walden said.

The borough was also able to drain water into Karluk Basin, and with cooperation from the Department of Transportation and Public Affairs, the borough drilled a hole under K-Beach Road, which allowed for water to be pumped from the basin, Walden said.

With that pipe already in place, during a future flood, the borough will be able to start pumping more quickly, Walden said.

“We hope that we don’t have to see how it works, but it’s there in case this happens,” Walden said. “And hopefully it will do exactly what we hope it will and move that water a little bit for you.”

Department of Natural Resources Division of Mining Land and Water Chief of the Water Resources Section David Schade said agencies are working to be proactive and on mitigation, other possible solutions and permitting.

Walden said the borough was able to protect infrastructure, but couldn’t pump water or install culverts on private property.

“We could help kind of look out for you,” he said. “If you were getting a downstream effects of water that wasn’t going to where it was supposed to and coming to your place, we tried our best to make sure that that wasn’t dumped directly on you.”

Schade said property owners have the right to reasonably protect their land and homes. He said pumping water out of crawlspaces and building a small dyke around structures is OK.

“We’re going to be perfectly fine with that as long as you’re not unreasonably turning and moving a lot of water to your neighbor,” Schade said.

Road Service Area Director Pat Malone discussed Buoy Street, which he said is a “special case.” The topography makes it challenging to drain. The slope on the road is about one-tenth of the recommended grade to make water flow. The ditch will be modified to increase capacity, but a difference will only be noticeable in a flood event, he said.

“I can assure the RSA will address the next flood event, but you’re still going to see water out there because it’s not practical to get rid of it and we’re not really capable of doing it just because of the topography,” Malone said.

Borough Mayor Mike Navarre said creating a flood service area has been discussed, but many points would have to be addressed including boundaries, mission, funding and timing.

Schade said he is looking into task force establishment as requested by a citizen petition to the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources Joe Balash.

Melissa Hill, hydrologist with the Division of Mining, Land and Water gave a history lesson on the geography and hydrology of the area and how that played into the flooding.

In researching the area, officials found a map published in 1958, which identified four different types of land classifications. Area four, which is about 20 square miles, is defined as swamp. The mapmaker noted the area is mostly unsuited for general land use due to poor surface drainage, Hill said.

The map was created prior to the construction of K-Beach Road, which shows the wetland existed before that development.

In comparing photos from 1982 and Feb. 2014, Hill said seepage of ground water through the bluff into the Cook Inlet is visible in both.

Following a site visit, it was determined that no dams or similar structures were impounding the water and making the flooding worse, she said.

The department believes the flooding, which involved groundwater and surface water, is the part of a regional event. Any decisions or drainage attempts made without scientific data will likely cost more and are less likely to be successful, she said.

“We’ve seen a higher precipitation rate in parts of Southcental (Alaska), but we just don’t have that hard data there,” Hill said. … “We’re missing two important components that we need — precipitation and then the subsurface data. That makes it tough because we can’t tell you the frequency of when it could happen again nor exact causation.”


Kaylee Osowski can be reached at

  • Comment

Comments (8) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
herbtr 08/24/14 - 03:24 pm

So, basically nothing was really said to help the residents. The mayor and friends just kicked the ball down the road.
(hopefully that ball floats)

Norseman 08/24/14 - 04:56 pm
This is not a taxpayer

This is not a taxpayer problem. This is a problem for the people who bought property in a known flood plain.
Thirty years ago I looked at buying property in that area and once I did a little research, I realized that it wouldn't be prudent. The land was cheap and there was good reason.

I do feel bad for the folks who either didn't bother to do some research first, but that is their problem, not the boroughs.

If you want to buy cheap swampland, then best be prepared to deal with it.

Suss 08/24/14 - 06:34 pm
Informative Meeting

Wonder if herbtr was at this meeting, or just spouting anti-government blah-blah-blah.

Bearup could advise those affected the worst on how to file for

Bankruptcy. Only do not forget Church income, like Bearup did!

"One such way for the trustee to challenge property is to claim that a nonprofit organization you are a part of. In this case, a married couple filed for Chapter 7 but did not tell the court that they were the founding members of a religious organization. They received their income from the nonprofit, and put every cent they had into it."

"However, the nonprofit was also so intermingled with their own property and lives that it was impossible for them to claim it should be excluded from their case. For instance, they shared living quarters with the headquarters of the business, they lived off of the proceeds of the organization, and they did not seek gainful employment outside of the organization. Because of these facts, the trustee successfully challenged their characterization of the organization as a nonprofit, and the property of the organization was used to pay creditors."

kearbear 08/25/14 - 12:44 pm
Were you at the meeting Suss?

Were you at the meeting Suss?

Raoulduke 08/25/14 - 06:26 pm
Poor Decision's etc,etc,etc.

The people that made the decision to purchase in a "FLOOD PLANE" .They should not be expecting the "GOVERNMENT" to pay for THEIR poor but yet PRIVATE,and PERSONAL real estate purchase decision.They are now going to have to pay for THEIR OWN mistake's.They should have done some research prior to THEIR purchase.They all thought. They were getting a good deal at the time.This is a private property owners problem. Which by now could be a public health problem. Brought on by the water diversion,and drainage made by the private property owners.The drainage of waters from inundated septic systems?

herbtr 08/25/14 - 08:40 pm

If your house is damaged by a Kenai Peninsula earthquake should we tell you "you knew there are earthquakes in Alaska, its your problem?"

leewaytooo 08/26/14 - 02:36 am
it is your problem, just like

it is your problem, just like it is everyone's..

the risk of living is borne by everyone. you

may mitigate your risk through insurance.

if you live in a flood/hurricane/earthquake area you may

purchase insurance, or you may have chosen to not

even live in those areas. due diligence is an option

prior to, not after. sucks that those people did not

do their homework prior to buying and or building

in a SWAMP, still,,,,,,,,,,,,,, the person living

in an apartment with a view of the back of some

other building is not going to be empathetic towards

those that built in a SWAMP, and expecting tax

dollars be spent on their problem.

Raoulduke 08/26/14 - 07:50 am
Apples,and Oranges

herbtr- Earthquakes,and Flood planes are two different things.But to answer your question of purchasing real estate in Alaska. One is,or should be aware of the earthquake frequency.Which I am. I also have homeowners insurance.Which was a PERSONAL decision. I would NEVER be reckless enough to purchase property in a FLOOD PLANE.If these property owners did not have flood insurance. A very irresponsible choice.Then when the inevitable happens(INUNDATION) to these PRIVATE property owners.You are now expecting the government to bail out YOUR poor decision. If you buy a used car.Do you not test drive,and give it a good going over prior to purchase? Then if you have problems with the car after purchase.Guess what? IT IS YOUR PROBLEM! Just like your choice of building sites.

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback