Current weather

  • Overcast
  • 54°
    Overcast
  • Comment

Catch share proposal a disgrace and an outrage

Posted: August 24, 2011 - 9:00am

The new halibut catch share proposal (CSP) will potentially devastate the charter fishing industry, local economies of Homer and Seward, and negatively impact virtually every business in Alaska with any dependence on tourism. Disguised as a conservation measure, this CSP will not in fact reduce the catch levels, but simply re-allocate a major share of the guided catch to the commercial sector that already controls the lion’s share of the resource. The proposal will in effect reduce the guided recreational bag limit next year in half from two fish to one. It contains an absurd provision whereby charter fisherman could “buy back” fish for their clients (from commercial fishermen) that will never work because at today’s prices that extra fish alone could easily cost $150!

First of all, the very body that wrote this rule is unequivocally controlled by commercial fishing interests. This proposal was passed by the NPFMC back in 2008 by a vote of 10-1, with the lone descending vote being the ONLY board member that truly represented the charter and sport fishermen interests. The North Pacific Fishery Management Council is a ruse that should represent all of us but in actuality 5 out of the 6 “fishermen” on the board have direct ties to commercial fishing and 4 out of the remaining 5 positions are politically accountable so they are also highly influenced by commercial interests. These positions are political appointments. Commercial fishing interests buy influence through political donations and they get appointed and control the very board that makes the rules controlling their industry. Kind of like the fox watching over the henhouse isn’t it? You need look no further than this recent Murkowski top fisheries advisor Fuglvog that will be going to jail and paying a large fine for commercial fishing violations to illustrate this paradigm. This crook was on the very board that wrote this CSP proposal. It’s bad enough that they write their own rules hoarding this precious resource, then they have the audacity to go out and poach. Disgraceful! This kind of big business control, influence, and greed sickens me. It amounts to nothing short of legalized bribery. Even the feds have chastised Palin and Parnell for not taking steps to make the board more balanced, but their pleas have apparently fallen on deaf ears and its “business” as usual here in Alaska.

Under this new proposal the commercial fleet will control up to 86 percent of the allowable catch while charter and sport fishing will be left with a mere 14 percent. The Magnuson Stevens Act mandates that these resources should be shared on a “fair and equitable” basis? Do commercial interests own the oceans? What gives them the right to hoard this precious public resource that belongs to all of us?  It’s true that total allowable catch has been reduced for the commercial fleet in recent years as well, but the huge increase in price has greatly mitigated this and more than made up for the reduction. There is no such remedy for the charter industry. An independent survey of over 150 sport tourists revealed that over 95 percent of them would not return to Alaska if their limit was cut in half to one fish.

An economic analysis was required to be accomplished by the NMFS as part of any new rule. By their own admission, they “didn’t have much data to base that analysis on.” Unbelievably, they didn’t even consider what this would do to the economies of Homer, Seward, or Alaska. With the sport fishing industry accounting for 1.6 billion dollars into Alaska annually what were they thinking? In a 2009 study by UAA professor Gunnar Knap he concluded that the economic contribution of sport fishing may be as much as 4 ½ times that of commercial fishing and the economic impact of sport fishing may be as much as 50 percent greater than that for commercial fishing. Here we are with our federal government spending billions of our tax dollars in economic stimulus money while at the same time they are about to pass this proposal that will have a far reaching negative impact on our state and local economies. Outrageous!

The charter fishing industry is already in the middle of a major shakeup with the new federal Charter Halibut Permit system that went into effect just this year. Even conservative estimates are that this alone eliminated over one third of the charter fishing businesses. This hasn’t even been taken into account in this new rule! Furthermore, the growth rates of halibut have changed so dramatically over just the past few years the fisheries data that this whole proposal is based on is already obsolete before it even becomes law.

Fellow Alaskans, this onerous legislation must be stopped and time is running out. We are already in the middle of the 45 day public comment period, the final phase before it is signed into law. Anyone that wants their children and grandchildren to be able to enjoy the bounty of this great land that we have been blessed with needs to take action. It’s time to put an end to this all too cozy relationship between commercial fishing interests and politicians. Write to every one of your political representatives, especially the governor and tell them under no uncertain terms if they don’t come out against this proposal and act to end this paradigm they will never get your vote again. Write to the Secretary of Commerce and the National Marine Fisheries Service and tell them their economic analysis for this proposal is a farce and if they are truly interested in commerce they will not sign this into law because it will devastate the commerce of some of our communities and affect every Alaskan business with any dependence on tourism. It’s time for all of us to stand up and tell them we’re wise to their game and borrow the line from the movie: “we’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it any more!”

Brian Emard is a retired Air National Guard Lt. Colonel (Desert Storm Veteran) and retired Delta Airlines captain. He has a degree in Wildlife/Fisheries Management  University of New Hampshire and is owner/operator Anchor River Lodge and AK Salmon Charters.

  • Comment

Comments (3) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
cheapersmokes
732
Points
cheapersmokes 08/25/11 - 09:13 am
0
0
Very well said!

Brian, I have to totally agree with you on this very important issue! The commercial fishing interests seen to have an almost strangle hold on legislation being passed totally in their favor. I would much rather see more outsiders coming up here and spending their dollars locally and then going home and boosting about their trip to their friends and families. It is not in Alaska's interest to try and provide all fish and seafood to the world!

BigRedDog
654
Points
BigRedDog 08/25/11 - 09:41 am
0
0
Over population of Chickens

One connection not being made leaves holes in any halibut allocation plan. Just how many more fish are really there is not being addressed. Biologist have said the bigger halibut have the capacity to overpopulate an area with chickens and thus place strains on the local fishery food stock. Having fished halibut some 30 years here I have noticed a change! There seems to be a very noticeable increase in the number small fish biting. And that is a very large increase. As in years past we caught chickens, it never seemed that there was this many around. Now it sometimes seems the Inlet must be tiled with fish and the bite doesn't stop or slow down. Just how many can you haul up before the tide flags your line? I hope these folks can outguess Mother Nature in their quest for answers, but I'm afraid they are really only guessing anyway! If indeed we are being overrun with chickens why not face the fact and focus on lowering that population? Why only think about cutting back on catch and size limits? Why not think about increasing catch number to 3 or 4 fish if all are under 20 or 30lbs? This would focus fishing on these smaller fish without impacting the larger fish numbers. Then if it ever seemed the smaller fish were getting low in numbers change the plan! To many real questions are going unanswered bye the Fishery Boards to say they know whats up! Is this overpopulation of halibut contributing to the local Mushy Halibut Syndrome (MHS)? Has no one from F&G made any announcements concerning MHS that would affect regulation? This MHS was rare 2 years ago, has become more of a problem lately. The MHS fish meat appears to be white when filleted resembling cooked halibut in color, not the translucent light pink of good fresh Halibut. Other signs are noticeable also. Fish giving up early and not fighting all the way when reeled up. Fish giving up when surfaced or placed on deck without a lot of vigorous flopping about. Local halibut charters have all noticed it and reacted to this MHS fish. Now most local charters all say "We don't keep skinny halibut!" and release fish in question. Halibut that look a little skinny are questionable as fresh healthy fish look like weightlifters or body builders. All muscled up with distinct cut lines and vigorous all the way from bottom to the fish box! Should we even release these fish when caught? Is this a diseased fish, released to compete for food with healthy fish? Do the fish ever recover from MHS or die? Maybe these questions need answered before some knee jerk is made regulation? As the number of MHS fish increases when does it effect the real thought process of regulation! Is there anyone out there writing regulations for the real good of the fish, or just for easy fines and revenue enhancement?

Raoulduke
2404
Points
Raoulduke 08/26/11 - 04:15 am
0
0
Now that people are starting

Now that people are starting to wake up to the fact.The sale of yet another Alaskan resource.Which was started under the guidance of "Uncle Ted".Do you still think.He was for the Alaskan,or himself.Look at the history of the commercial fishing industry.Who says what is FAIR,and EQUITABLE?

Back to Top

Spotted

Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321268/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321253/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321248/
  • title http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321243/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321208/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/320593/
  • title http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321173/ http://spotted.peninsulaclarion.com/galleries/321163/
My Gallery

CONTACT US

  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback

ADVERTISING

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES

SOCIAL NETWORKING

MORRIS ALASKA NEWS