Current weather

  • Overcast, light rain
  • 61°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

Obama seeks to hold the public's trust

Posted: September 17, 2013 - 5:48pm  |  Updated: September 17, 2013 - 8:13pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama wasn’t just seeking Americans’ support for military action in Syria. He also was seeking their trust.

Whether he earned it will not only color his response to the use of chemical weapons in Syria’s civil war but also his legacy as a world leader and the success of his broader second-term priorities.

With the majority of Americans against the use of force in Syria, Obama asked them Tuesday to have confidence in his judgment as commander in chief if he launches a strike despite their opposition. And he asked them to have faith that a president elected to end wars was still trying to find another way out, perhaps a diplomatic deal at the United Nations to secure Syria’s chemical weapons.

“I know that after the terrible toll of Iraq and Afghanistan, the idea of any military action, no matter how limited, is not going to be popular,” Obama said in a prime-time address from the White House, adding that he has a “deeply held preference for peaceful solutions.”

No matter the outcome of the Syria standoff, keeping the public’s faith is a daunting task for Obama at a time when he’s already fending off lame-duck status. With trust intact, Obama has space to maneuver on Syria and other issues.

But should he lose the public’s confidence, Obama would find it more difficult to wield influence on the world stage, much less persuade Congress to pass immigration overhaul, rally support for budget issues or build backing for critical elements of his signature health care law.

Politicians of all stripes would have little incentive to follow a weak president if the public — the people who vote for lawmakers — don’t trust him.

“The president does need the American public and the broader international community to trust his judgment on this issue, which he did not choose, in order to allow them to trust him on the issues he really does choose,” said Jeffrey Engel, the director of the Center for Presidential History at Southern Methodist University.

Tuesday’s address wasn’t the speech Obama had originally planned to give.

But rapidly moving diplomacy forced him to recast the address from one aimed at building support for a congressional use-of-force resolution to one explaining why he is he spending so much time on a matter that so many Americans oppose.

“I know Americans want all of us in Washington — especially me — to concentrate on the task of building our nation here at home, putting people back to work, educating our kids, growing our middle class,” he said. “It’s no wonder then that you’re asking hard questions.”

More than 60 percent of Americans want Congress to vote against authorizing a military strike against Syria, according to a new Associated Press poll. And the opposition cuts across party lines, with 53 percent of Democrats, 59 percent of independents and 73 percent of Republicans saying Congress should vote against the plan to strike Syria.

Point by point, Obama tried to address their concerns during his 15-minute address. To those who question whether it’s worth taking limited action, he argued that a targeted U.S. strike “will send a message to (Syrian President Bashar) Assad that no other nation can deliver.” To those who fear Assad will retaliate, he downplayed the Syrian regime’s ability to threaten U.S. interests. And to those who fear a limited strike in Syria will ultimately pull the U.S. into a lengthy conflict, he said he had no interest in starting another war.

“I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria,” he said. “I will not pursue an open-ended action like Iraq or Afghanistan.”

Again and again, Obama’s message was clear: Trust me.

More than four years into Obama’s presidency, most Americans say they do — but he’s lost ground on that measure since he’s been in office.

According to a Gallup poll out this week, 55 percent of Americans said they saw Obama as honest and trustworthy, down from a high of 63 percent in March 2008 when he was a candidate for the White House.

The president and his advisers are mindful of the damage a further slip in those numbers could have on the remaining years of his presidency.

Obama’s predecessor George W. Bush never recovered in his second term from a rapid loss of trust as the death toll in Iraq mounted and much of the intelligence used to bolster the case for war was discredited.

The government’s botched response to Hurricane Katrina also was a drag on Bush’s credibility because it cemented the impression for many Americans of a president who was out of touch and lacked compassion.

Rep. Peter Welch, a Democrat from Vermont, said Obama’s efforts to distance the strike he is seeking from the Iraq war could carry weight with the president’s skeptical supporters.

“The Democrats have a lot of appreciation for the fact that we have a president who’s a war-ender, not a war-starter,” Welch said. “When he says it’s limited, personally, I think Democrats believe him, because of his history. It’s not a fear that it’s George Bush and regime change.”

But underscoring the uphill fight Obama faces, even Welch says he’s undecided about how he would vote on military action.


  • Comment

Comments (5) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Watchman on the Wall
Watchman on the Wall 09/19/13 - 08:58 am
Paragraph 3 & 5 express a

Paragraph 3 & 5 express a desire from our president that we have FAITH in him and his ability to lead us down the golden road to prosperity, sounds like that religious stuff dreams are made of to trust and place all our hopes in something other than self. Well if it's ok with him and others I'll just place my FAITH elsewhere and know I have a far greater chance of eternal success Thank You.
FAITH - The substance of things hoped for and evidence of things not seen.
We have seen and heard from our president and that's why the over whelming lack of FAITH in his ability to accomplish any of his Dreams for a good future for America or anyone else that follows his lead.
Hope I was not to harsh here with expressing where my FAITH & ONLY HOPE lies out side of him.
As I have said many time Politics and Religion go hand and hand and in fact to many their Politics is their Religion. Politicians ask you to place your hope in their ideals and either you vote yes or no, the same is true of Religions and as we all know many or both are not what they proclaim and we are faced with another choice You can either look for something better to Hope in or stumble along with what you have.
It's all of our freewill to choose what we will place our Faith & Hopes in.

Watchman on the Wall
Watchman on the Wall 09/19/13 - 09:33 am
Obama sets another Red Line

Obama sets another Red Line with Iran this time.
Obama tells Iran they can keep their nuclear program but they just can't make nukes. I'm sure Iran will accept these terms of surrender from America just like Syria did and keep on going down the same nuke's road aided and supplied by Russia with no fear from America what so ever.
Oops, there's that Russia leading the way towards peace & safety for Israel with more Islamic nations.
Well fortunately for Israel also has a President that has drawn a Red Line for Iran and he knows that his nation will be attacked if peaceful Muslims have it their way.
It's getting real bad real quick in the middle east folks so hang on as we all watch what's next for Red Lines
Have a GR8 day as we all go forward with that Hope to Believe that our president promised us all.

JohnPeterZenger 09/19/13 - 10:00 am
Politics and religion

Politics and religion might go 'hand in hand' in your world, as you so inelegantly convey, but most of the rest of us have chosen to live in a more objective world.

In other parts of the world, religions need to be protected from governments.

In the United States, it's our government that needs to be protected from religious zealots.

Our founders instituted a clear separation of church and state for a very good reason.

Watchman on the Wall
Watchman on the Wall 09/19/13 - 10:38 pm
So SVP I mean JPZ & Raoulduke

So SVP I mean JPZ & Raoulduke I would like to thank you two for caring and wanting me to stay on topic, I appreciate that as it's my desire as well. Lets do lunch and work out a training session for me, I'll buy. And I thought I was doing so much better to. Trust me. I really don't want to be blocked again because it's so much fun playing word games with all of you during my spare time and it also helps my typing and spelling skills. Oh by the way what's your take on the article which I seem to have caused you to forget about commenting on? Do you think the public should place our faith in Obama?

Raoulduke 09/20/13 - 03:07 am

WOW - Religious Zealots never get any better.They just get more booooooooooooooooring.The people have voted President Obama into office TWICE.So! The question of the public having faith in President Obama is a question that has already been answered. Wouldn't you think?

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback