Current weather

  • Overcast
  • 57°
  • Comment

The dangers of Russian exceptionalism

Posted: September 18, 2013 - 6:17pm

In his instantly notorious New York Times op-ed, Vladimir Putin was much too modest. At the end, he argued no country is truly exceptional. He, of all people, shouldn’t be so dismissive. Russian exceptionalism is one of the profoundest forces in world history.

Without it, not nearly as many people would have been sunk in tyranny for centuries, casually sacrificed to the whims of their rulers, and immiserated. It has been the basis for the absolute power of czars and of Soviet dictators, and its spirit lives on in the amoral, lawless rule of Russia’s top opinion writer.

If you want to understand the essence of American exceptionalism, you can quote Patrick Henry or the Declaration of Independence. If you want a taste of the Russian version, you can do worse than the anecdote about Czar Nicholas II -- fated to suffer an ugly end at the hands of the communists -- who was asked by a Western diplomat about regaining public confidence. The czar wanted to know whether he was supposed to regain the confidence of the people, or the other way around?

Throughout its history, Russia has labored under what the historian David Satter calls “the quasi-deification of the Russian state,” its special mission overawing picayune considerations of individual liberty or dignity.

In its imagination, Russia was the Third Rome. It picked up where Rome and Byzantium left off, and as the vessel of orthodoxy, took as its mission the defense and the spread of the true faith. The church became an arm of the state, and the state itself became sanctified. Satter quotes a description of how the Czar of Muscovy, circa the 16th century, evoked “resounding incantations, hyperbolic praise, and groveling obeisance.”

Given its geographic vulnerability, with Mongol or Turkish invaders perpetually threatening, the Russian state required a vast military establishment and universal conscription. “Under these conditions,” historian Richard Pipes writes, “there could be no society independent of the state and no corporate spirit uniting its members. The entire Russian nation was enserfed: there was room here neither for a privileged aristocracy, nor for a class of self-governing burghers, nor yet for a rural yeomanry.”

In the West, private property constituted a check on the power of government absolutism. In Russia, the monarch owned the entire realm up until the late 18th century, so there was no need to convene a parliament to exact taxes -- and no leverage for the kind of revolt against the crown that forged the Magna Carta in England.

People did gain political and civil rights in the early 20th century. Almost immediately they were snuffed out again in a violent revolution. It brought to power a mass-murdering dictatorship that sought the utter destruction of every hint of life independent of the state. The special mission of Russia was transformed to serve Marxist instead of Orthodox ends, but the individual still counted as nothing.

It is against this backdrop that Vladimir Putin scorns American exceptionalism and a Russian parliamentarian, upon news of the Navy Yard shooting, identifies it with mass killings. It is true that we have a notably violent culture. We also have a deep-rooted inheritance of liberty. As James Bennett and Michael Lotus demonstrate in their new book, “America 3.0,” American exceptionalism is a centuries-old phenomenon growing out of organic English roots: the nuclear family, the common law, representative government, constitutional limits on the state, and private ownership of land.

It makes for a political culture hostile to autocracy and therefore deeply at odds with Russian exceptionalism. “Speaking of Russia,” the 19th-century Russian philosopher Pyotr Chaadaev wrote, “people always imagine that they are speaking of a country that is like the others. In fact, it is not so at all. Russia is a whole separate world, submissive to the will, caprice, fantasy of one man -- no matter whether he be called Peter or Ivan.”

Or, he must imagine and hope, Vladimir.

Rich Lowry can be reached via email:

  • Comment

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
JohnPeterZenger 09/18/13 - 09:44 pm

More Rich Lowry? Yet more self-absorbed psychotic imprudence from a thoroughly disgraced loon?

More crackpottery boosterism by the Clarion editors?

Note to editors of Clarion: Stop shamefully humiliating yourselves.

If not for your own sakes, think of what your children will have to bear upon their becoming aware of what you're doing.

Watchman on the Wall
Watchman on the Wall 09/19/13 - 08:29 am
Speaking of Russia and the

Speaking of Russia and the Times. I see that the Times has plastered Putin's mug all over their Magz's cover for sales world wide except here in America. From zero to hero two different Presidents have switched places. What's next for Putin, the Nobel?
We are in some major troubles here with or flip-flopper red line drawer that spoke with out his teleprompter and now can't remember ever drawing anything and blamed all the world instead.
I wonder if by chance the Times drew the Russian Bear next too Putin, or Putin's face on the bear that is spoken of as the Super power that comes out of the north quarters with it's Islamic allies to wage war with Israel in the last days?
Looks like trouble brewing for all the world either way one looks at it. As I stated somewhere we are danged if we do and danged if we don't punish Syria with a gentle shot across their bow as Obama called it.
Of course I called it a steering up the hornets nest for no reason other than to do so. It's always better to strike a hornets nest and kill all the hornets before they can fly off and attack you, but even then you sometimes get stung. This will all come to a bad situation for mankind everywhere, that's a promise.

potomac 09/22/13 - 06:22 pm
Russia and Times

I like what Watchman has to say and there is a lot of truth in it, although I don't want to see another Bomb or young man go to war over in the middle east as we always rebuild after we bomb and get no where except deeper in debt no matter how great a cause we are fighting for. I would like us to take care of our country America for a while and let the monsters over there take care of them selves till they are a threat to us, then , and only then , should we clean out the "hornets"

JohnPeterZenger 09/22/13 - 10:02 pm
Know what I like?

I like that neither you nor watchman will have a chance to determine or define American foreign policy.

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback