What others say: Changing the rules

The thing about changing the rules when in power is that you have to follow them when you aren’t in charge.

That’s what the Democrats accomplished when they ended filibustering — a 200-plus years rule — in the U.S. Senate in recent days.

Frustrated with President Obama’s nominations for federal positions being held up in the Senate, the Democrats eliminated filibuster rights. Then the nominees started to move forward in the process of filling positions.

The effect is that Senate Democrats will find it easier to push their party’s agenda. It won’t be necessary to win over a single Republican. It is similar to what the Democrats did when they wanted to see Obamacare passed. Remember? Just vote for it, and find out what is in it afterward?

This move by the Democrats portends no better outcome than Obamacare, which has turned out to be a disaster.

To essentially tie the hands of the minority, which the Republicans are in the Senate, is to refuse to listen to another point of view and march forward with one’s own. This is a dangerous way to do business, because no party is right all of the time. The minority tends to provide restraint when business or lack of it meanders out of control.

It also is likely the first step toward the Democrats losing control in the Senate. The voting public feels more comfortable with checks and balances; it will elect Republicans if the Democrats reach for too much power, as appears to be the case.

Then, the Democrats will be in the position of the minority, and will have to follow the rule they created, which is no filibustering on certain nominations.

It won’t seem like such a good idea then.

— Ketchikan Daily News,

Nov. 25

More

Op-ed: Trump won the news conference

Donald Trump should do press conferences more often. Not for the country’s sake, certainly not for the media’s sake, but for his. He really shouldn’t have waited 167-plus days to hold one, because the man gives great sound bite. Although I’ve participated in probably thousands of these staged encounters as a reporter, they’re not my favorite way of getting news — you almost never get any. The guy at the podium controls the proceeding. He can get his message out with little challenge from the assembled journalists who are limited to a question and a follow-up, maybe. Politicians can bob and weave through that without any of us landing a blow. And that’s our job: to penetrate the canned responses to their version of the controversy du jour and get at whatever truth they are hiding. Besides, Trump — who uses contempt for the media as a weapon, his preferred way to discredit reporting that displeases him —has a wonderful forum to do that. At the very least he should hold these confrontations as a supplement to his Twitter tirades. And frequently. It’s his opportunity to hold the media hostage as they cover live his rain of abuse on them.

Read more

Good luck in Juneau

The 30th Alaska Legislature gavels in on Tuesday, and we’d like to take a moment to wish our Kenai Peninsula legislators good luck over the coming months in Juneau.

Read more

Ready to weather the storm

If there’s a bright spot in the recent headlines regarding Alaska’s economy, it’s this: on the Kenai Peninsula, the bad news isn’t nearly as bad as it could be.

Read more

Letters to the editor

Chuitna mine threatens Alaska way of life

Read more