Current weather

  • Overcast, light rain
  • 55°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

What other say: Governor's budget reflects reality

Posted: December 26, 2013 - 1:09pm

State Democrats should be thanking Gov. Sean Parnell after he released his proposal for the fiscal year 2015 budget.

If they didn’t have Senate Bill 21 to kick around as a convenient cover for falling oil prices and production, they might have to explain why Alaska is not only nearing a financial day of reckoning under the tax regime known as ACES they hold near and dear, but why they didn’t do anything about it.

Instead, they get to do what they do best: put out hysterical press releases claiming that Parnell’s push to stem the production decline through lowering taxes hasn’t worked, never minding that it hasn’t even gone into effect yet.

The state rakes in cash when prices are high even as production declines, but that same progressivity formula in ACES that escalates the take bites the state in the rear as prices drop and increasing capital expenditures reduce the taxable net income.

The Democrats love to have it both ways when it comes to those capital expenses on the North Slope. On one hand, they claim that Slope spending is at an all-time high under ACES as proof that the regime works.

But when it’s time to pay the piper through reduced tax revenue because those capital expenditures come at a cost to the state, suddenly Democrats don’t trust the numbers and suggest that companies are overinflating them to reduce their tax liabilities.

It’s the height of either hypocrisy or cognitive dissonance to claim ACES has resulted in increased spending while also claiming that the numbers from the producers are being fudged depending on what day it is. That’s a feature of ACES, not a bug, and it’s a well-documented result of highly progressive tax systems.

Another popular argument among the Democrats against SB 21 is that the projects now being touted by the Parnell Administration were underway before tax reform was passed and would have happened anyway.

It is certainly true that ConocoPhillips’ Colville Delta project, CD-5, in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska predates SB 21 by several years. It’s also true that CP has plenty of other options worldwide to spend its capital.

As a company’s board of directors decides where to spend its cash in an upcoming year, it doesn’t hurt that the party that sounds like South American Socialists is no longer running the show in Juneau.

The revenue picture is not great at the moment for Alaska, but it is also true that private spending funding Alaska jobs is poised to fill the gap of less public spending in the capital budget.

CD-5, Point Thomson now in a second construction season, additional investment from BP on the way and ongoing exploration and development by Repsol and Brooks Range will total billions of dollars and hundreds if not thousands of jobs for the future.

South to Cook Inlet, ConocoPhillips is seeking to restart LNG exports, Agrium has begun the process of resuming business at its Peninsula fertilizer plant and Furie Operating Alaska is planning to build the first Inlet production platform in nearly 30 years thanks to past state investments that are now paying off with an improved gas supply picture.

While only the producing companies’ bottom lines stand to benefit directly from tax reform — and the recent Revenue forecast suggests it’s a wash at current prices under either formula — there is a reason that every business organization in the state along with Alaska Native corporations are backing Parnell on SB 21.

They know doing nothing has a cost, and that talk isn’t always cheap. They also know making money is a lot harder than spending money, and that’s a reality Alaska Democrats still can’t come to grips with.

— Alaska Journal of Commerce,

Dec. 22

  • Comment

Comments (4) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
Suss 12/28/13 - 03:20 pm
Compare Tax Rates

How does Alaska's tax rates on our oil compare with any other owner's tax rate? Alaska has been giving away the oil.

Raoulduke 12/28/13 - 08:07 pm

Yes! Alaskan's should be on their knees to this personage.He is after all. The Oil Corporate LOBBYIST Governor.Ask yourself. Just who do you think.He is truly working for? Remember! Tax breaks for oil companies.Which the original reason for tax breaks was exploration,and development.This was to get us off of the foreign oil dependency.Now these tax break incentives started in 1976.Yes! 37 years later.We are more dependent on foreign oil than ever.There has been alternative energy R,&D shelved by these same corporation's.Tell me.Who is playing a game,and who is/has been duped? The Alaska Journal of Commerce if one has read any other of their opinions.I come away with a feeling of an OIL PR magazine.

KenaiKardinal88 12/29/13 - 11:02 am
Alaska Taxes Near The Top

Alaska's total tax rate is top quartile in the world. Third-world cesspools have lower rates than we do.

The Dems and liberals love to bash oil; meanwhile, their union lackey's and special interest groups are stealing Alaska blind and driving up our unfunded liability costs.

If you oil haters kill the business, what next? Will you tax commercial fishers at the same rates?

Suss 12/29/13 - 11:54 am
Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback