Current weather

  • Overcast, light rain
  • 54°
    Overcast, light rain
  • Comment

What others say: Local governments right to act on gas pipeline concerns

Posted: March 5, 2014 - 4:46pm

Officials in several Alaska municipal governments have begun expressing concern about how their respective communities have been left out of the natural gas pipeline talks between the administration of Gov. Sean Parnell and the leaders of the three major oil companies operating on the North Slope.

The local officials, including Mayor Luke Hopkins of the Fairbanks North Star Borough, are concerned about the impact that a January agreement between the administration and the oil companies might have on local property taxes.

Specifically, they point to a provision authorizing the commissioner of the Alaska Department of Natural Resources to negotiate financial terms of a gas pipeline with the three oil companies. Those negotiable terms include allowing the companies to pay local property taxes through a system known as “payment in lieu of taxes” rather than through the usual value-based system that applies to residential and commercial property and that can fluctuate from year to year.

Mayor Hopkins and leaders of the Kenai Peninsula Borough, the North Slope Borough, and the city of Valdez are mobilizing to get a feel for the potential impact. They say it’s urgent because the Legislature is considering bills that would implement the agreement reached between the governor and the oil executives.

What these local leaders want to do is hire one or more consultants to rapidly gauge the impact the agreement could have on property taxes that would be levied on the gas pipeline as well as on taxes levied on existing oil company property.

The idea is for each of the four local governments to provide $50,000 for the work. The funding request by Mayor Hopkins is scheduled to be considered at a Thursday work session of the Finance Committee of the Borough Assembly.

Language accompanying the funding ordinance spells out the mayor’s frustration:

“(M)unicipalities were not invited to comment on the terms of the Heads of Agreement, and to date, have not been invited to participate in the state’s ongoing efforts to negotiate with the producers nor received any briefing or information about the potential impacts to municipalities. .”

Most Alaskans — and probably most local government officials — would agree that construction of a natural gas pipeline from the North Slope is in the state’s best interest. Nevertheless, local leaders need to be assertive in making sure their local governments aren’t harmed in the process. That’s what they are supposed to do.

Spending $50,000 now to join with other municipalities to get some good information about the property tax impact is a smart investment. Coming up short in property taxes on oil company property, whether on the gas pipeline or on existing property, could affect your own property tax bill.

— Fairbanks Daily News-Miner,

March 4

  • Comment

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
WinchesterM1 03/08/14 - 02:07 pm
Better do it now muni`s,

Better do it now muni`s, while you still have the chance, and protect your taxing sovereignty, as well as the state`s,`ll be too late five years from now..and ten..even thirty or more. This is a an assault on our constitutional obligations as set out by the state founders. We should certainly vet this better than Stedman did SB21, and dot out i`s and cross out t`s, before we go agreeing to a thing involving a long no-option process with these four multinational companies giving up our taxing ability or options TO BOOT!!! it`s a BAD PRECEDENT. It`ll be too late once Parnell and Tillerson and the boys from Houston, as well as BP get this thing rolling as a "done deal".... and Alaska is faced with fiscal calamity while we carry Transcanada`s water, well as the slope cartels "risk" (BP 12% owned by Qatar..a major competitor to Alaska!! you see a conflict?) . If we don`t "look before we leap",..more than cursorily, we will certainly pay the piper for not having done so, considering the way they are trying to railroad this thing into being, despite what appears to be massive concessions by the people of Alaska unnecessarily, and I believe recklessly, and foolishly. If it doesn`t pencil out without Alaska owning equity and risk instead of taxing authority, then it doesn`t pencil out period. Thank you for the forum Clarion..

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback