Current weather

  • Clear sky
  • 55°
    Clear sky
  • Comment

Rich Lowry: The war on women comes to the Supreme Court

Posted: July 2, 2014 - 4:55pm

It has long been suspected that the Supreme Court hates women, although it took the court’s 5-4 decision in the Hobby Lobby case to fully reveal its blatant misogyny.

The court held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act forbids the administration from forcing Hobby Lobby — an arts-and-crafts chain owned by evangelical Christians — to cover contraceptives that its owners object to on religious grounds (specifically, four drugs that it believes act as abortifacients).

If you don’t see the anti-women agenda at work in this decision, you aren’t as discerning as the hysterics on the left who point out, accusingly, that the five justices in the majority are all men. QED.

Sen. Harry Reid, displaying his unfailing instinct for the inane, tweeted, “It’s time that five men on the Supreme Court stop deciding what happens to women.” The majority leader seems to believe that the court was deliberating in the case of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., et al. v. The Fate of Women’s Freedom in the United States.

The ruling was quite limited. It didn’t strike down the contraception mandate, and as such is only a small carve-out from the sweeping extension of government power represented by the mandate. The decision only says that the mandate can’t apply to Hobby Lobby and other closely held corporations (defined by the IRS as firms where five or fewer individuals hold 50 percent or more of the value of the corporation) that oppose it on religious grounds.

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act, passed by Congress in the 1990s with large bipartisan majorities, created a broad protection for religious liberty. It says that government can’t create a substantial burden on someone’s exercise of religion unless it is using the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government interest. The court held that there are less restrictive means for the government to get women the drugs in question, including paying for them directly rather than forcing Hobby Lobby to cover them.

The cry from the left is that this constitutes the end of women’s “health” as we know it. Press Secretary Josh Earnest said President Barack Obama “believes that women should make personal health care decisions for themselves, rather than their bosses deciding for them.” Taking this non sequitur and running with it, Sen. Patty Murray, a Democrat from Washington state, opined that the decision “takes us closer to a time in history when women had no choice and no voice.”

Of course, Hobby Lobby doesn’t have the power to deny its employees the drugs it finds objectionable, nor does it claim such a power. Women who work for the company can buy them on their own. For that matter, Hobby Lobby doesn’t claim the right to stop them from having abortions. The women who work for Hobby Lobby have exactly as much “choice” now as they did prior to the decision.

The left can’t get its head around the idea that the law or the Constitution sometimes limits the means whereby it seeks to achieve its ends. The left doesn’t really do law. It often doesn’t even do reasoning. It does bullying and demagoguery. In the argument over Hobby Lobby, it has brought the logic of the “war on women” — its shameless smear job — to the Supreme Court.

There are numerous lawful ways around the Hobby Lobby decision. If it wants to get at the root of the matter, Congress can carve out an exception from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act for the contraception mandate, or repeal the act in its entirety. Surely, if liberal lions like Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton had foreseen how the act would eventually get in the way of the left’s coercive cultural agenda, they never would have supported it in the first place.

But finding a way to eviscerate or kill the act is for another day. For now, inveighing against the sexist Supreme Court is the priority.

Rich Lowry can be reached via e-mail:

  • Comment

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
hutchca 07/07/14 - 10:27 am
SCOTUS Hobby Lobby decision

Considering that various reproductive cancers among women are higher when there has never been a pregnancy or when there has been an abortion, I have to take issue with the idea this decision is against women.

If this information regarding cancer is true, and it must be I have read it on the "all knowing" internet, then continuing a pregnancy to term (the result of not having access to abortient drugs) is more of a health advantage for women. Also, it must be considered that in addition to this more healthy option for women, the left leaning liberals such as the representative from Washington have provided an income for this mother who the sperm donor has abandoned.

In my opinion this decision is against the men involved in the equation. When the birth control is not available, and the pregnancy comes to term; there is an immediate effort by the left leaning liberals, Begich, Murray and a myriad of others, to rush out, hunt down the sperm donor and squeeze out of him every last dime available from his 10.00/hour job if he has one.

So the bottom line is the efforts of the left have been:
-Convince women they are victims;
-Raise generations of warfare driven children ;
-Deny the better wage earner (men are paid more than women) the fruits of his labor;
-EVISCERATE THE MAN be seizing any disposable funds and preventing relationship with his children;
-Drive one more shive into the family based moral culture of this country, so
-SOCIALISM pending Communism can be fully entrenched.

Please someone comment to the contrary; but only such that I can see the light!!!

jford 07/06/14 - 09:25 pm
Considering you're pushing disproven debunked myths,

all wrapped up in your own hash of barely recognizable misconstrued right wing solecisms, heavily sprinkled with a few what must be outright malapropisms, whatever you 'take issue' with should be viewed as the result of nothing much more than a highly overworked imagination, because none of what you offered has anything to do with medical fact, and once beyond that, the rest is just daft, and ignores reality on several levels at once.

I've got to hand it to you, though, …thought I'd never see anyone out-Palin Sarah herself, the king of right wing word salad hokum. If you worked on it, you just might pass her by.

As a public service, here is an opinion on the decision from a reality based view:

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback