Can we trust the Pebble permitting process?

I attended the public presentation given by Pebble Partnership last week in Homer. I asked Mike Heatwole, vice president of public affairs, how much public land would be off-limits to hunting if Pebble is approved. He said this will be "negotiated" with the Department of Natural Resources.

This gets to the heart of what's wrong with State's permitting process. Instead of meeting definitive criteria established a priori, important aspects of permitting will be negotiated; in essence a politically-based call.

This raises serious concern. Despite all the rhetoric about rigorous permitting, the statutory requirements for DNR's water rights permit (vital for Pebble) are based on "the commissioner shall consider." The statute does list several generic concerns, but never defines consider; hence requiring nothing that is technically defensible. Apparently, reading a report could qualify. In short, the statute gives the commissioner wide discretion, leaving the door open for lots of private negotiation and judgment about what data suffices, verification, resource trade-offs, etc. Is this comforting? Not to me.

More

Thu, 04/27/2017 - 22:01

Letters to the editor

Panel discussion on homelessness productive

Read more

Support the University of Alaska

It is time to speak up to support the University of Alaska. By 2025, 65 percent of the jobs in Alaska... Read more

Funding education is an obligation

I’m writing you all to express my concern over the proposed cuts to our education. I consider education to be our obligation to our youth.... Read more

Book sale proceeds benefit Kenai library, community

“Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.” –... Read more

Around the Web