Appointed service area boards have upside

I support borough assembly Ordinance 2012-07 to appoint, rather than elect, members to service area boards.

Board members provide an important public service and do so whether appointed or elected. We have a good history of appointed board activity. It is easier for people new to politics to apply for a position than to run for election. And service area boards are a good place to get started in public service. I have served on a service area board and found no difference in quality between those members who were elected and those who were appointed when no one ran for an open seat or a member resigned.

I appreciate Ms. Murphy’s amendment for the mayor to seek board input on applicants, without obligation. This provides an opportunity for important local knowledge.

Voters don’t have much information to rely on when choosing service area board members because candidate statements are not included in the election brochure. However it is not often an issue because there is rarely a contest for a seat. In fact, it is often hard to keep service area boards full.

Appointing service area board members would also reduce the number of ballots required for an election, which would make the voting process easier for all of us.

More

Letter to the editor: New energy options for Alaska

Surprising news from two different sources. Analysts now believe that consumers will purchase electric vehicles at a much faster rate than previously thought... Read more

Mon, 07/17/2017 - 11:21

Letter: U.S. needs more substance, better quality

U.S. needs more substance, better quality Read more

Letter: Time to stop saddling a dead horse

Time to stop saddling a dead horse

Read more
Thu, 07/06/2017 - 21:38

Letter: Teach children to be entrepreneurs

Teach children to entrepreneurs Read more