Appointed service area boards have upside

I support borough assembly Ordinance 2012-07 to appoint, rather than elect, members to service area boards.

Board members provide an important public service and do so whether appointed or elected. We have a good history of appointed board activity. It is easier for people new to politics to apply for a position than to run for election. And service area boards are a good place to get started in public service. I have served on a service area board and found no difference in quality between those members who were elected and those who were appointed when no one ran for an open seat or a member resigned.

I appreciate Ms. Murphy’s amendment for the mayor to seek board input on applicants, without obligation. This provides an opportunity for important local knowledge.

Voters don’t have much information to rely on when choosing service area board members because candidate statements are not included in the election brochure. However it is not often an issue because there is rarely a contest for a seat. In fact, it is often hard to keep service area boards full.

Appointing service area board members would also reduce the number of ballots required for an election, which would make the voting process easier for all of us.

More

Letters to the editor

Chuitna mine threatens Alaska way of life

Read more

Surprising results to fill the assembly seat

When I first walked in the room I was immediately intimidated. I thought there had to be a mistake. I walked into the Clerk’s Office to confirm... Read more

Hacking not tolerated, neither is unethical behavior

Let me see if I understand: Russia hacks the DNC and discovers acts they deem to be unethical by American standards. This information is then... Read more

Looking forward to a better 2017

Happy New Year to all!

The evening after Christmas Day, 2016 and while contemplating possible discussion topics for our next “What the... Read more