Current weather

  • Overcast
  • 59°
  • Comment

Fish and Game takes wrong approach with river restrictions

Posted: May 14, 2013 - 8:58am

On the evening of May 9th the Kenai-Soldotna Fish and Game Advisory Committee had an emergency meeting with approximately 70 people in attendance. The participants were comprised of a diverse group of fishing guides, commercial fisherman, sport fisherman, and business owners. The topic of the evening was an emergency order that was arbitrarily and capriciously issued by ADF&G on the afternoon of May 9th. This order changed the management plan for the early run of chinook salmon on the Kenai River to catch and release only. There was unanimous opposition to this plan from all attendees, an unprecedented show of solidarity from such a diverse group.

ADF&G reasoning for its decision is the department’s “projected” low return of early-run chinook. ADF&G has “estimated” the early return to be 5,326 chinook (at best an educated guess) and has an optimal escapement goal is 5,300-8,500 fish. While conservation of chinook salmon is a priority, there is some rather basic information available that ADF&G should have addressed. If an open fishery, as was originally planned by the department, was allowed to progress they would at least have in-river fish counts and catch numbers to indicate the true run size of the run. In 2012 the projection for early run of chinook salmon was similar to this year’s estimate. There were less than 200 fish caught and killed by June 7th, which is the historical quarter point of the early run. With an exploitation rate last year of approximately 200 fish, logic would indicate an in-river catch rate of more than 200 fish would mean that the run was going to be larger than expected and a lesser rate a smaller return.

Rather than rely on actual catch rates and in conjunction with the new sonar counter, the department waited until now to reveal this decision even though they established their 2013 return estimates last year. The position of meeting attendees last night is that ADF&G has acted irresponsibly in this matter and that the damage to the local economy that this action will cause is unwarranted. The proper management decision would be to execute the fishery as planned, and take action to further restrict or liberalize as the run develops. While a cautious approach is prudent, their current decision places complete reliance on the new, untested, sonar counter to establish the size of the return without angler input.

ADF&G should reverse the decision that they have made. The damage our economy will suffer this year and for years to come, will be from the perception of “Alaska is closed to salmon fishing.”

  • Comment

Comments (30) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
smithtb 05/27/13 - 01:01 pm
More cows, less pasture.

We know that ocean currents shifted and are currently less favorable for our King and Coho salmon - this a a known phenominon - Chinook runs in the PacNor are on the flip side of this and are doing quite well right now - as well as can be expected considering the habitat destruction they have experienced in their rivers.

Long story short, our Kings have a smaller ocean pasture in which to graze right now.

We also know that the current trend of statewide low King abundance was preceded by record levels of statewide high King abundance several years ago - the Kenai, Copper, Deshka, Nushagak, and Kuskokwim rivers (and others) experienced record runs in the mid-2000's. These were the parent years of our current returns. Not to mention record levels of smolt production in our hatcheries.

What happens when you send a larger number of calves to a smaller pasture?

Or it could just be that somebody else is catching all YOUR, fish, huh 123?

leewaytooo 05/28/13 - 03:19 am

"In 2012, Amendment 93 was implemented in the GOA to limit the amount of Chinook salmon caught in the pollock fishery. Amendment 93 establishes separate prohibited species catch (PSC) limits in the Central and Western GOA for Chinook salmon, which would cause NMFS to close the directed pollock fishery in the Central or Western regulatory areas of the GOA, if the applicable limit is reached. This action also requires retention of salmon by all vessels in the Central and Western GOA pollock fisheries until the catch is delivered to a processing facility where an observer is provided the opportunity to count the number of salmon and to collect scientific data or biological samples from the salmon."

why wait until the "catch" is "delivered"?????

mount cameras with satellite uploading and "fish recognition"
software to count the by catch..

the incentive to dump salmon overboard before being
"delivered" is advantageous to the pollock fishery.

until you close all the loop holes you will never
really "KNOW" what is going on with the salmon.

you also have to include the gill netters and guides
in the "accountability" process.

over population is a major problem for the whole

maybe the only solution is for a human population

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback