Current weather

  • Broken clouds
  • 50°
    Broken clouds
  • Comment

Regarding the call to repeal Ordinance 2011-12

Posted: June 10, 2013 - 6:36pm  |  Updated: June 11, 2013 - 8:53am

Wasn’t it interesting to receive the mailed flyers recommending the repeal of Ordinance 2011-12, from Chicago, Illinois! Wow, with all their big city problems, amazing they take an interest in the Kenai Peninsula of Alaska. First off, if the Assembly accepts Ord. 2013-18, Ord. 2011-12, which was never enacted on the Kenai Peninsula, will be history.

As so carefully explained by Chief of Staff, Paul Ostrander at the Assembly meeting on June 4, every issue brought forward by the public during the Task Force meetings has been addressed in Ordinance 2013-18. It seems like the only public that attends the meetings and speaks are those opposed to any protections for our salmon rivers. And that is sad. Those of us who do care, need to make our voices heard too. What brought us to the Peninsula? I know for myself, the fishing opportunities and ability to provide for family was a huge incentive. I think that is the case for many of us.

Yes, the state does try to protect the rivers, but it is up to us on the Peninsula to extend that protection to the streams that are the nurseries for the future generations of fish. The existing code, which was passed in the year 1996 and 2000, affected over 3,000 private parcels of land, and covered the major rivers of the Peninsula. I believe it was Drew Scalzi’s proudest moment of his service on the Assembly, because he recognized the need.

The new code will add another 1,000 parcels to fully protect what is the Kenai Peninsula’s economic engine, our fisheries. The code will grandfather existing uses, it certainly does not deny land use, but instead asks the property owner to protect that which we need to protect for the future. It does not lessen property values.

The Ordinance coming before the Assembly on June 18 is huge, 27 pages because it lists every water body individually, but it’s worth looking at and noting how they are bending backwards to accommodate both property owners’ concerns and the need to protect the fishery nurseries.

We cannot afford to lose our fisheries, and to wait is folly. Just as the Watershed Forum has worked over the past 5 or 6 years to replace culverts to assure fish passage, so too we need to protect the streams they utilize. I hope those of you who agree with me, will take a moment to let the Assembly know how you feel. It is easy. To email the clerk, Johni Blankenship:, and she will distribute your comments to the Assembly. (Linda Murphy is the Assembly President.)

  • Comment

Comments (1) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
hutchca 06/11/13 - 01:42 pm
KPB O 2011-12 and KPB O 2013-18

2011-12 and 2013-18
One thing is definiately for sure from reading the comments on 2011-12 (the original ordinance) and 2013-18 the amendment submitted by "fuzzy scientist" laden task force:

- People are uninformed as to the details of either of the Ordinances, and too lazy (common malady) to learn enough to have an informed opinion;
- The true Alaskans of the "I do not care how they do things outside" is no longer among us. The current Alaskan wants to live and look like the "cheechako";
- People are willing to sacrifice their God given rights of the US Constitution in order to feel good about something/anything. Typical Assemblyperson position, I do not care about rights of people, I will always vote for the fish.
- There has been only one violation of any significance since 1996 and that was resolved through education;
- The common Assembly thinking is education is fine; but does not go far enough and needs to have a stick to enforce good stewardship of your private property. The property owner cannot be trusted to take care of his own property;
- The enforcement will essentially be one neighbor reporting on another until considerable and unnecessary expense has been created and passed on to KP property owners;
- These regulations have been in place since 1996 and have not protected the KINGS. Habitat protection will not extend to over fishing which is not discussed in either of these ordinances;
- There has been not one geographically relevant study presented with regard to the fish habitat on the Kenai Peninsula; but again let the KPB assembly just apply in one broad stroke, the principles used outside;
- Where have all the Alaskans gone??

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback