Former judicial council member concerned with amendment

As a former public member of the Alaska Judicial Council, I take issue with current efforts in the legislature — through SJR 21 and HJR 33 — to change Alaska’s Constitutional framework for selecting judges by dramatically altering the composition of the council.

Adding more politically appointed public members will not foster greater diversity or ensure broader representation. The Governor already has the power to appoint council members who are more geographically balanced and ethnically diverse. At least four Alaska Natives have served on the council since Statehood: Mary Jane Fate of Fairbanks (1981-1987); Leona Okakok of Barrow (1987-1993); myself, originally from McGrath (1995-2000); and Gigi Pilcher of Ketchikan (2000-2005).

That no recent Governor has appointed a rural resident or ethnic minority is no fault of our judicial selection process. The proposed amendment would not ensure a more balanced council. It would instead expand the ability of political leaders to ensure the dominance of their own views on the council, however narrow and unrepresentative they may be.

More

Letters to the editor

Chuitna mine threatens Alaska way of life

Read more

Surprising results to fill the assembly seat

When I first walked in the room I was immediately intimidated. I thought there had to be a mistake. I walked into the Clerk’s Office to confirm... Read more

Hacking not tolerated, neither is unethical behavior

Let me see if I understand: Russia hacks the DNC and discovers acts they deem to be unethical by American standards. This information is then... Read more

Looking forward to a better 2017

Happy New Year to all!

The evening after Christmas Day, 2016 and while contemplating possible discussion topics for our next “What the... Read more