Former judicial council member concerned with amendment

As a former public member of the Alaska Judicial Council, I take issue with current efforts in the legislature — through SJR 21 and HJR 33 — to change Alaska’s Constitutional framework for selecting judges by dramatically altering the composition of the council.

Adding more politically appointed public members will not foster greater diversity or ensure broader representation. The Governor already has the power to appoint council members who are more geographically balanced and ethnically diverse. At least four Alaska Natives have served on the council since Statehood: Mary Jane Fate of Fairbanks (1981-1987); Leona Okakok of Barrow (1987-1993); myself, originally from McGrath (1995-2000); and Gigi Pilcher of Ketchikan (2000-2005).

That no recent Governor has appointed a rural resident or ethnic minority is no fault of our judicial selection process. The proposed amendment would not ensure a more balanced council. It would instead expand the ability of political leaders to ensure the dominance of their own views on the council, however narrow and unrepresentative they may be.


See Also


More

Letters to the editor

Alternatives to smoking unfairly discouraged

Read more

Thanks to track meet participants, volunteers

North Peninsula Recreation Service Area would like to thank all of the participants and volunteers involved in our annual Nikiski Youth... Read more

Why the pushback over net pens?

The recent article on Cook Inlet Aquaculture Association net pens was very informative. The use of the net pens is temporary, used to imprint fish.... Read more

Bigger issues in Kenai

Regarding the May 18 article “Council mulls Lawton Acres”:

All this hoopla over a contaminated piece of property. So much angst over a strip of... Read more

Around the Web