Send SB 21 back for a rewrite

I am a life-long Alaskan (72 years), I am finally jumping in to the debate over SB21 … that I do so now is due to a sickening sense that folks are more concerned about jobs and ‘now’ than they are about what I see down the road … an avalanche of debt for the State of Alaska, and no way to get rid of it. Well, of course, there IS a way to eliminate the debt … three ways, actually … tap into the Permanent Fund, reinstitute State income tax, or institute a state sales tax.

First, the oil companies are not here because they love us and want to see Alaska do well. They are here for the oil. Period. And until that last drop runs down the pipeline to Valdez, they aren’t leaving. They posture and protest, and threaten, that jobs will be lost, work will slow down, the sky will fall … because they have to pay Alaskans, who own the oil, a fair share of taxes.

Here’s a little history: I lived through three of the four resource extractions that have been taken out of Alaska. I missed the gold rush. After that, were the canneries, who used fish traps with impunity to rape and pillage nearly the entire salmon industry in Alaska. Statehood stopped that.

Next on the scene was the timber industry. Alaska had always supported a small thriving sawmill industry that sustained itself, but there was all that timber, virtually free, and in popped two pulp mills … one in Ketchikan, 1954, and one in Sitka in 1959. Having to log under ‘rules’ didn’t suit them, so by the 1980’s they had abandoned Alaska with their riches.

And then came oil. Different though. Oil was after a finite, non-renewable resource. Fish hatcheries and reforestation will never replace oil when it’s gone. With oil, we felt rich. We were rich. We had people like Gov. Hammond giving us the PFD so we could all share, and people like Byron Mallott ensuring it was set up for our benefit. We had many leaders who cared more for the well-being of the State than for short term gain. We got railroaded. The resource rapists are several giants who are sitting on our resource and threatening us. They quit buying legislators, and instead made sure they got ‘company people’ elected into positions which would guarantee the oil companies would be writing the laws to get oil as cheaply as possible. What do the people of Alaska have to hope for when the oil is gone? Go back to paragraph one. That is what our choices will be.

I live in Alaska because I love it. I hate to see it suffer at the hands of interests who don’t care. Alaska deserves better. We deserve better. We deserve not to be left holding the bag of interminable debt. Sending SB21 back to the legislature for a rewrite so that Alaska gets a fair and equitable share of our resource money will not make the oil companies go away. What do you want our future to look like? If you don’t care, well, so be it. If, however, you can see down the road, let’s work together to make sure Alaska gets its fair share now, so we can invest in a future when there is no oil.

Read the pertinent material; know the truth; vote early; vote smart.

More in Opinion

Dawson Slaughter is president of the Anchor Point Chamber of Commerce and a candidate for State House District 6. (Courtesy photo)
Opinion: Children, education, obligation

Our children and the future children of Alaskans must always be the priority and first in our education concerns

The Exxon Baton Rouge, smaller ship, attempts to off-load crude from the Exxon Valdez that ran aground in Prince William Sound, Valdez, Alaska, spilling over 270,000 barrels of crude oil, shown March 26, 1989. (AP Photo/Rob Stapleton)
Point of View: Exxon Valdez oil spill brought out local heroes

When the Exxon Valdez ran aground in Prince William Sound 35 years ago, local people sprang to respond long before Exxon provided any help

Larry Persily. (Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: No Alaska governor has ever so boldly held schools and students as political hostages

‘Star Trek’ reference looks past real argument for school funding

Rep. Justin Ruffridge, a Soldotna Republican who co-chairs the House Education Committee, speaks in favor overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Rep. Justin Ruffridge: Supporting education

Capitol Corner: Legislators report back from Juneau

Rep. Ben Carpenter, a Nikiski Republican, speaks in opposition to overriding a veto of Senate Bill 140 during floor debate of a joint session of the Alaska State Legislature on Monday, March 18, 2024. (Mark Sabbatini / Juneau Empire)
Rep. Ben Carpenter: Education is too important to keep getting wrong

Capitol Corner: Legislators report back from Juneau

Larry Persily. (Juneau Empire file photo)
Point of View: Some state lawmakers need to embrace reality, not PFD political theater

State revenues minus public services do not leave enough in the checkbook to pay an oversized dividend

Rep. Ben Carpenter, R-Nikiski, speaks about teacher bonuses during consideration a bill increasing state funds for public education in the Alaska House of Representatives on Thursday, Feb. 22, 2024, in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Rep. Ben Carpenter: Holding up a mirror to state government

Capitol Corner: Legislators report back from Juneau

Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, speaks in opposition to an executive order that would abolish the Board of Certified Direct-Entry Midwives during a joint legislative session on Tuesday, March 12, 2024, in Juneau, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Sen. Jesse Bjorkman: Ensuring food security for Alaska

Capitol Corner: Legislators report back from Juneau

Most Read