Current weather

  • Few clouds
  • 61°
    Few clouds
  • Comment

Elbow room

An Outdoor View

Posted: February 10, 2012 - 12:02pm

When Outsiders find out I'm from Alaska, they often ask why I live there. I say it's for the fishing, but the real reason has more to do with elbow room.

The population of Washington, where I'm spending the winter, is pushing 7 million, about 10 times Alaska's population. In terms of people per square mile, Washington has 101. That's 100 times more people per square mile than Alaska.

Population density greatly affects fishing quality. The more people, the more impact on fish and damage to habitat. The more people, the more rules needed to protect the fish and habitat. More rules equate to less freedom and enjoyment.

It may be helpful to have a lawyer along to interpret the regulations while fishing in Alaska, but Washington is worse. The Evergreen State's stringent fishing regulations have evolved as a result of a large-and-growing population.

For example, Washington went "barbless" years ago. Barbless hooks are now required for all species in Puget Sound, except for jig gear for forage fish, such as herring. When fishing for salmon in any marine waters of the state, single-point, barbless hooks are required. Barbed hooks are still allowed in Alaska waters, and treble hooks are allowed in most Alaska waters.

Under the Endangered Species Act, Puget Sound chinook salmon and steelhead are listed as "threatened." The Washington sport-fishing regulations are peppered with restrictions due to concerns over this or that salmon stock. In Alaska, no fish are listed.

Remembering the way things used to be in Washington can be pleasant, but it's also a curse. In the 1940s, my family spent a lot of time exploring Puget Sound and camping in the San Juan Islands. Jigging up a rockfish or lingcod for a meal was something we took for granted. Back then, my dad would launch his 14-foot skiff from a Fidalgo Island beach and jig for cod and rockfish at Lawson Reef. The season never closed, and the limit was how many you could catch before it got dark or the weather turned bad.

It's vastly different now. In most of Puget Sound, the lingcod season is open for only 45 days, and the daily limit is one. It's illegal to fish for or retain any species of rockfish in the Sound. Outside Puget Sound, in the Pacific Ocean, you can still fish for and harvest rockfish, but it's a mere glimmer of what it used to be. A 15- to 20-year-old black rockfish is a rarity. On the other hand, anglers fishing Southcentral Alaska waters still routinely catch black rockfish that are more than 40 years old.

All along the Pacific Coast, from the U.S.-Mexico border to the Alaska-Canada border, areas where fishing and other activities are restricted have been set aside to protect various species, especially rockfish. Usually called Marine Protection Areas (MPAs) and Rockfish Conservation Areas (RCAs), they were initiated after long-lived rockfish species were nearly extirpated. Alaska, while having similar rockfish species, has no such areas.

I blame population pressures for most of Washington's problems. When it comes to fishing, there's no comparison between the two states. While there's nowhere near as much elbow room as there was in 1964, when I first made Alaska my home, there's still lots of good fishing.

Les Palmer is spending his first winter as a snowbird in Bellingham, Wash. He can be reached at

  • Comment

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
cbeard 02/13/12 - 02:49 pm

Unfortunately, Les can't seem to acknowledge that while Alaska has "better" fishing it is a severely unregulated state with overfishing problems and a conspiracy-like method of discretely raising the allowable pollutant contamination in fish supplies every year as pollutants invade Alaska's waters exponentially. The result? A facade that Alaska is somehow "better" fishing. We may have more fishing areas and more open limits, but our stock is severely unhealthy and with having to constantly fight trespass fishing, overdevelopment (like the Pebble Mine), and just plain tourism-driven overfishing, makes me not support Alaska seafood at all.

There is no reason we have to have advisories warning pregnant women, children, and seniors from eating halibut. Why is halibut as toxic as industrial medication now? People who fish Atlantic halibut routinely look at the halibut we catch and say "Wow. These look pretty unhealthy. Look at the mushy meat!"

It's now advised to not eat the fattier portion of salmon meat near the skin, because of the pollutants that build up in deposits there. Why is this?

Washington state ONLY has 7 million people. That is not a lot for a place its size. Using Alaska as a comparison to judge places that are "overpopulated" is not a good idea, because it's not a useful data set. Washington doesn't have that many people who enjoy fishing per capita as well, so these regulations aren't devastating at all.

By comparison, Washington's fishery is becoming more sustainable, even with 7 million people, because the state pays more attention to stocks and is working on restoring river habitats along with Oregon. Why can't Alaska, a severely UNDERpopulated state with a huge habitat of fish, create a sustainable industry?


kenaibear2001 02/14/12 - 09:48 pm
Lets say it like it is:

Les doesn't live in Alaska, He just collects the PFD. Les, Stay in WA!

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback