Current weather

  • Clear sky
  • 63°
    Clear sky
  • Comment

The elephant in the room

Posted: April 6, 2012 - 9:04am

In the late 1970s, landowners along the Kenai were outraged when told by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that they could no longer dump fill on their wetlands. In the 1980s, many boaters were more than a little bit peeved when the state placed a 35-horsepower limit on the Kenai, forcing them to buy a new motor -- or motor and boat. In 2008, many of these same boaters were once again riled when the state initiated a 4-year plan to remove older-technology 2-stroke motors from the Kenai. Now comes turbidity caused by boat wakes.

That boat wakes cause turbidity -- a highfalutin' word for muddy water -- is nothing new. The first time a motorized boat went up the Kenai, when its wake hit the bank, it no doubt muddied the water a little bit. With the sharp increase in boat traffic on the Kenai over the past 40-some years, that "little" has raised enough concern about the river's health to cause meetings to be held, studies to be initiated and bureaucrats to be involved.

The trouble with turbidity caused by boat wakes is that it negatively affects little things most of us seldom see, important things like insects and young salmon. Because we don't see these things, we don't see a problem. We don't even realize when these key pieces of the river puzzle are gone.

Key pieces undoubtedly are going. A 1998 assessment of the lower Kenai by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game indicated that some already are gone. According to the study, there were "significant" differences in the amount of aquatic life found in stream-bottom sediments above and below urbanized areas, suggesting "habitat changes or possible cumulative impacts from water quality degradation."

Due to increasing concerns about the harmful effects of turbidity caused by boat wakes, the Kenai Watershed Forum began monitoring it in the lower Kenai in 2008. It's quite possible that findings of these studies could trigger another "impaired" listing for the Kenai, and that actions will have to be taken to reduce or eliminate boat wakes.

The process of finding a "fix" for the turbidity problem will generate its own waves, and they'll be mountainous. Many people won't even acknowledge that turbidity is a problem. They'll say, "Lots of rivers are muddier than the Kenai, and they still have salmon." People with investments in boats, motors, land, homes, lodges, docks and other "improvements" will fight to keep what they've got. Sides will be taken, fingers pointed.

A major problem facing those in favor of reducing the turbidity caused by boat wakes is that few of the effects of turbidity can be quantified. No one can answer the question, "How many more salmon will the Kenai River produce if all motors are banned?"

If you thought previous battles over the Kenai were fierce, you haven't seen anything. I can already hear it: "You believe that garbage? The head of that group is a commercial fisherman! Those salmon chokers will do anything to get back some of the fishing time they've lost because of all the sport fishing on the Kenai."

"If it wasn't for there being too many fishing guides, we wouldn't be having this problem."

"I blame it all on Bob Penney. Before he came along, there was plenty of fish for everyone."

I'm conflicted about this turbidity thing. I'm no biologist, but I've seen what boat wakes do. Aside from what's happening with sediments, I don't believe a juvenile salmon can make a living in the surf-like environment along the banks of the lower Kenai in July, when boat traffic is at its peak. If I were thinking solely about the health of the river, I'd say it should be "drift only," no motors allowed. On the other hand, I have a 40-year history of fishing at places and using fishing methods that require the use of a motor. The ramifications of a total ban of motors would be huge to me, as would any limit on my use of the river.

This is one of those issues that we either solve ourselves, or we wait for the government to solve for us. The government, with its strict water-quality standards, is already involved. At the very least, it's time we acknowledged the elephant in the room.

Les Palmer can be reached at

  • Comment

Comments (2) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
cormit 04/07/12 - 08:22 am
Kenai River

The important thing is that our community remains vigilant in assuring the health of the Kenai River ..... at any cost or inconvenience to any of todays users.

hunteralaska 04/08/12 - 07:13 pm
A Healthy River?

A agree with a lot of what you said Les. I've lived and fished on the Kenai River since 1969. I remember when you would see only a dozen or so boats between Big Eddy and Eagle Rock at the height of King Season. Gone are the days of releasing a 45 pounder because you knew there were bigger ones to catch that day. The number of large King Salmon have steadily declined over the last 40 years. Increased numbers of anglers, better fishing techniques, better tackle, and the world wide web have all contributed to it. Over the years user groups have orginized and managed to get a bigger piece of the pie. I remember 40 years ago when the commercial fishermen stagged a protest at the office of Fish and Game over increased limits for sportsmen on the peninsula rivers. Sports biologists fought against commercial biologists, commercial fishermen fought against sport fishermen for the right to the harvest. Personally, I've sided with the commercial fleet even though I am not a commercial fisherman. Their numbers were capped in either 1969 or 70 with limited entry permits. Why havent' the number sport guiding permits been capped? To allow sport guides more of the harvest without limiting permits is unfair. They, along with private anglers are 100% responsible for the turbidity and loss of habitat in our streams and rivers. Respect for fellow anglers by guides is at an all time low. I've been cut off and yelled at many times on the Kenai River by sport fishing guides. I've never been cut off or yelled at by a private boat. Not all guides are rude. The majority of them recognize they must share the resource with others and promote healthy methods of harvesting fish. After all, it's their bread and butter. I see no end to the struggle. The numbers of our big King Salmon will continue to deminish, sport fish guides will continue to push for their agenda at the expense of the rest of all user groups, fights will continue between the commercial fleet and sport fishing groups, and those who choose not to be involved will gripe how they are getting the shaft. If you don't want to see something happen, get involved and have your say. Otherwise, complain to the dog catcher. I am sad to see our rivers become the mess they are. I long for the days with my Father when just he and I would spend the day together on the lower Kenai River fishing. And catching the fish that our family canned up for winter to help feed our family. Alaska has provided us all with so much. From natural resources like fish and game, to oil & gas, the PFD, no state income tax, we have all enjoyed the fruits of our land. Let's remember that and continue developing plans to sustain these valuable resources so our sons and daughters can catch the big ones or get a job that sustains their familes.

Back to Top


Please Note: You may have disabled JavaScript and/or CSS. Although this news content will be accessible, certain functionality is unavailable.

Skip to News

« back

next »

  • title
  • title
  • title
My Gallery


  • 150 Trading Bay Rd, Kenai, AK 99611
  • Switchboard: 907-283-7551
  • Circulation and Delivery: 907-283-3584
  • Newsroom Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Business Fax: 907-283-3299
  • Accounts Receivable: 907-335-1257
  • View the Staff Directory
  • or Send feedback