Hammond's income tax proposal carries too many shortfalls

Posted: Tuesday, April 27, 2004

Former Gov. Jay Hammond professes to be mystified at the lack of widespread support for his idea of imposing a state income tax.

If he had his way, Hammond would distribute all the earnings from the permanent fund, expected to be about $1.4 billion this year, and then ''claw'' it back as needed with a 5 percent income tax based on an individual's federal tax obligation. The tax would kick in only if the amount in the Constitutional Budget Reserve were to fall below $1 billion. There are myriad reasons not to support Hammond's tax. Among them:

Hammond's plan would reinstitute the state income tax that Alaskans fought to repeal years ago, a tax dumped by Hammond and his pals in the Legislature only after voters, led by Libertarian Dick Randolph, forced the repeal onto the ballot;

The proposed 5 percent state income tax would raise only an estimated $90 million for the state in those years the CBR had to be replenished, hardly enough to dent the average budget gap;

Alaskans would pay an additional $14 million to $15 million annually in federal income taxes for the larger dividends; and,

Setting up a new bureaucracy to collect the taxes would cost about $6 million and as much as $8 million to operate annually.

Hammond is on record lamenting the demise of the income tax, and this plan is a little more than a smoke and mirrors attempt to breathe renewed life into such a levy.

Does anybody really believe that such a tax would be equally applied, even at 5 percent, for very long? You can bet that there would be immediate calls for those who make more to pay a higher rate on a graduated scale. Is the 5 percent just an enticement to lure the public into supporting what is nothing more than a state income tax that would grow and grow? And it would have to grow. A lot.

Hammond wrote recently that if there were no other taxes imposed and development did not occur in the state to lighten the fiscal load, Alaska could face a $1 billion fiscal gap in the not-too-distant future. No problem, he says. Assuming the fund's earnings would be $1.6 billion and all of that would be disbursed as dividends, about $900 million would be ''clawed back'' from Alaskans and $100 million would come from nonresidents. Alaskans would still share as dividends about $700 million, close to the amount now used for the annual payout.

How in the world would the approximately $90 million collected by a 5 percent state income tax even begin to allow $900 million to be clawed back from Alaskans? State Revenue officials estimated that an onerous 34.15 percent levy on Alaskans' federal tax liabilities would raise only $682 million. What Hammond fails to grasp is that Alaskans do understand his plan probably better than he does.

The Voice of the (Anchorage) Times

April 21

Subscribe to Peninsula Clarion

Trending this week:


Peninsula Clarion © 2015. All Rights Reserved. | Contact Us