Summer nutrition program misses most eligible kids

Posted: Friday, July 14, 2000

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Alaska has the lowest rate -- less than 3 percent -- of participation of poor children who get free or discounted lunches during summer.

Nationwide, fewer than one in four kids participates in the federally funded program that's designed to replace regular school lunch programs. Poor children who get free or discounted lunches at school are entitled to get two free meals daily during the summer.

Alaska's participation rate of 2.9 percent is due to the state having few highly populated low-income areas, according to an official with the state Department of Education.

''We don't have concentrated pockets of poor people like they do in places like Los Angeles,'' said food programs administrator Suzanne Greeley.

Alaska's participants are mostly in urban areas, such as Anchorage, Fairbanks and Kenai, although Nome and the Dot Lake area northwest of Tok also participate in the federally funded summer food program. Rural communities generally are busy at fish camp and subsistence hunting so people have enough to eat in the summer, according to Greeley.

''There's been little interest from those areas,'' she said, adding that organizations that want to be involved must initiate their participation.

Nationally, there aren't enough day camps, activity centers, schools, churches and other sites authorized to offer the meals, and federal rules make it too difficult for organizations in some areas to qualify for the program, nutrition advocates said Thursday.

Some 3.2 million children participated in the federally subsidized summer food program last year out of the 14.9 million who get free or reduced cost lunches at school, according to Agriculture Department data analyzed by the Food Research and Action Center, a private advocacy group.

''States and communities are falling far short of using available resources fully, and many needy children are missing the meals and vital nutrients they need during the summer just as much as they do the rest of the year,'' said Lynn Parker, a spokeswoman for the group.

Nine other states beside Alaska have participation rates under 10 percent, the largest of which is Texas, where 142,374 youngsters got free meals last summer out of the 1.6 million children in the school-lunch program.

The District of Columbia had the highest participation rate, at 67.6 percent, followed by Nevada at 44.1 percent and California at 43.6 percent.

''When you look at the children on the school lunch program, common sense tells you that these kids are not eating well in the summer unless they find somewhere to go to eat, because there just isn't anything at home,'' said Anita Reyes, food acquisition director for the San Antonio Food Bank.

Federal rules inhibit expansion of the summer program in rural and suburban areas because 50 percent of the children fed by an organization must be eligible for subsidized school lunches, says the Food Research and Action Center.

Unless 50 percent are eligible, the group providing the meals gets no USDA reimbursement for any of the children fed. That threshold was raised from 30 percent as a cost-cutting move in the 1980s.

Reimbursements for the summer meals are $1.25 for each breakfast served, $2.18 per lunch or supper and 50 cents per snack.

Seven states -- California, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Texas, Vermont and Washington -- chip in some of their own money to make up for a cut Congress made in the reimbursements in 1996.

With the low participation rates, many children are winding up in soup lines, said Doug O'Brien, public policy director for America's Second Harvest, a hunger relief program that distributes food to 200 food banks nationwide.

Half of those food banks reported in a 1998 survey that they have ''many more'' children coming in for food during the summer than at other times of the year.

The San Antonio organization, which serves a 20-county area of south Texas, said only 10 percent of the families it serves participated in the federally subsidized summer nutrition program.

''If you expand the summer food program, you'll drive down demand at feeding programs. We don't believe that kids should be getting food at soup kitchens and church pantries when there's a summer nutrition program,'' said O'Brien.

USDA officials have been visiting states with the lowest participation in the program to recruit new organizations.

Beginning in 1997, Texas required all school districts to offer summer meals if at least 60 percent of the children in the district were eligible for them.

''We're trying to make it available in every possible community,'' said Chris Traylor, a spokesman for the Texas Human Services Department. Rural areas ''are the most difficult to target.''

Missouri, meanwhile, is requiring that programs be available in areas where 50 percent of the youngsters are eligible.


On the Net: USDA's Food and Nutrition Service:

Food Research and Action Center:

America's Second Harvest:

Subscribe to Peninsula Clarion

Trending this week:


© 2018. All Rights Reserved. | Contact Us