Regarding the issue with beekeeping in Woodland subdivision in Kenai, as a homeowner in that subdivision, I am concerned about the safety issues created by the bees. Earler this summer, my dog was stung when she stepped on one of the bees in my back yard. I had no idea that anyone in the neighborhood was keeping hives (because it is against city code to keep livestock within the city limits), so I didn't think to register a complaint with animal control. The vet bill was $55.
The bees were a constant nuisace this summer, as they spent a lot of time in my yard, on my lawn sprinkler, and in the flowers. As a result, I was not comfortable spending any time enjoying the back yard with my dogs for fear of them or myself being stung again.
I am not against bee-keeping. I think it is a noble pursuit and I am glad people are doing it. However, the fact is that bees are a stinging insect, and Woodland is a densely populated neighborhood where children, and family pets spend a great deal of time outdoors.
What will happen if a person with bee venom allergies is stung? Is the beekeeper prepared for the liability associated with keeping an animal that can potentially kill a person? If that be the case, and the measure is passed to allow bee-keeping within city limits than I propose they register and inform all households within bee-flight distance of the risks and benefits associated with the hive.
It's not about how wonderful the bees are. It's about the safety of the human population.
Holly Hecht, Kenai
Peninsula Clarion ©2013. All Rights Reserved.