A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)

A sign designates a vote center during the recent municipal election. The center offered a spot for voters to drop off ballots or fill a ballot out in person. (Ben Hohenstatt / Juneau Empire File)

Opinion: The failure of mail-in voting

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me

Rich Moniak

There’s no other way to say this. Juneau’s last municipal election was a failure. The results were certifiable, but the ballot rejection rate of 8% is beyond unacceptable. That we’re just learning this now doesn’t foster trust in voting by mail.

The argument that mail-in balloting increases voter participation never impressed me. Making it easier to vote does little or nothing to encourage the development of a well-informed electorate.

I also had little faith that the U.S. Postal Service was up to the task. And knowing how my signature has evolved over time left me wondering if my ballot would be accepted. As it turns out, these were among the main reasons why the majority of the 700 ballots were rejected.

Lastly, I thought it was an unwise decision to make while Donald Trump was endlessly whining that the 2020 election was stolen from him.

As the Heritage Foundation has documented, in rare instances actual voter fraud resulted in elections being overturned or elected officials removed from office. In those cases, the perpetrators were either individuals or small groups acting outside the knowledge of either political party.

In almost all other situations, voter fraud has had no impact on election results. And there’s never been evidence of a large, coordinated conspiracy to rig an election.

But thanks to Trump, a third of the country thinks Democrats used mail-in ballots to execute fraud on a massive scale.

“Mail ballots are a very dangerous thing for this country, because they’re cheaters,” he said six months before a single vote was cast. “They’re fraudulent in many cases.”

He stayed on that message right up until Election Day.

“This is a fraud on the American public,” he cried late that night.

Afterward, Trump falsely claimed “there were more votes than people who voted” in crucial swing states and “FAR MORE VOTES THAN PEOPLE” in Detroit, Michigan.

“This election was rigged,” he said in a speech posted to Facebook on Dec. 2, 2021. “We already have the proof. We already have the evidence, and it’s very clear.”

More on that lie to follow.

By then the well of election integrity had been poisoned. Trump continued to dump more toxic lies into it after he left the White House. A lot of it focused on unverified claims of mail-in ballot fraud. And as if his incessant rage had no impact on any voters here, in April Juneau’s assembly decided to use it anyway.

A few weeks later, Anchorage provided ample evidence of the mistrust for mail-in elections that Trump created. In the mayoral runoff there, almost all ballots were cast by mail. Election officials reported that most of the 95 election observers weren’t trained. And during the process of counting the votes, that unusually high number of observers “strained the small staff at the Election Center” and subjected officials to “intense scrutiny” and “unprecedented harassment.”

David Bronson, the conservative candidate, won the race by less than 1.5%. If an 8% rejection rate been disclosed three months afterward, it would have been the liberals arguing mail-in balloting was flawed.

In an Empire op-ed published the day after Juneau’s municipal election, former state Rep. Cathy Munoz raised valid concerns about mistakes CBJ made when sending ballots to her family.

“The goal of getting greater participation in our electoral process is a goal that I strongly support,” she concluded. “However, the integrity of our vote cannot be jeopardized in that pursuit.

While I absolutely agree with her statement, the biggest threat to election integrity everywhere is Trump’s lies.

The latest development on that front should make it easier for responsible Republicans like Munoz to publicly refute them.

This week, a reporter asked Trump why two of his own election lawyers stated in court last year that they weren’t alleging fraud. “It was too early to ask for fraud and to talk about fraud,” he said. In other words, the clear proof of fraud Trump claimed to have a month after the election results never existed.

All noble paths run through the truth. The ones that matter here are Trump lost a free and fair election and mail-in voting isn’t a panacea when so many voters don’t trust it. Denying either one other is undermining the health of our democracy.

• Rich Moniak is a Juneau resident and retired civil engineer with more than 25 years of experience working in the public sector. Columns, My Turns and Letters to the Editor represent the view of the author, not the view of the Juneau Empire. Have something to say? Here’s how to submit a My Turn or letter.

More in Opinion

Nick Begich III campaign materials sit on tables ahead of a May 16, 2022, GOP debate held in Juneau. (Peter Segall / Juneau Empire file photo)
Opinion: North to a Brighter Future

The policies championed by the Biden/Harris Administration and their allies in Congress have made it harder for us to live the Alaskan way of life

Soldotna City Council member Linda Farnsworth-Hutchings participates in the Peninsula Clarion and KDLL candidate forum series, Thursday, Sept. 5, 2024, at the Soldotna Public Library in Soldotna, Alaska. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: I’m a Soldotna Republican and will vote No on 2

Open primaries and ranked choice voting offer a way to put power back into the hands of voters, where it belongs

Shrubs grow outside of the Kenai Courthouse on Monday, July 3, 2023, in Kenai, Alaska. (Ashlyn O’Hara/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Vote yes to retain Judge Zeman and all judges on your ballot

Alaska’s state judges should never be chosen or rejected based on partisan political agendas

A vintage Underwood typewriter sits on a table on Tuesday, Feb. 22, 2022, at the Homer News in Homer, Alaska. (Photo by Michael Armstrong/Homer News)
Point of View: District 6 needs to return to representation before Vance

Since Vance’s election she has closely aligned herself with the far-right representatives from Mat-Su and Gov. Mike Dunleavy

The Anchor River flows in the Anchor Point State Recreation Area on Saturday, Aug. 5, 2023, in Anchor Point, Alaska. (Delcenia Cosman/Homer News)
Opinion: Help ensure Alaskans have rights to use, enjoy and care for rivers

It is discouraging to see the Department of Natural Resources seemingly on track to erode the public’s ability to protect vital water interests.

A sign directing voters to the Alaska Division of Elections polling place is seen in Kenai, Alaska, Monday, Oct. 21, 2024. (Photo by Erin Thompson/Peninsula Clarion)
Vote no on Ballot Measure 2

A yes vote would return Alaska to party controlled closed primaries and general elections in which the candidate need not win an outright majority to be elected.

Derrick Green (Courtesy photo)
Opinion: Ballot Measure 1 will help businesses and communities thrive

It would not be good for the health and safety of my staff, my customers, or my family if workers are too worried about missing pay to stay home when they are sick.

A sign warns of the presence of endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales at the Kenai Beach in Kenai, Alaska, on Monday, July 10, 2023. (Jake Dye/Peninsula Clarion)
Opinion: Could an unnecessary gold mine drive Cook Inlet belugas extinct?

An industrial port for the proposed Johnson Tract gold mine could decimate the bay

Cassie Lawver. Photo provided by Cassie Lawver
Point of View: A clear choice

Sarah Vance has consistently stood up for policies that reflect the needs of our district

Alex Koplin. (courtesy photo)
Point of View: Ranked choice gives voters more voice

The major political parties are not in touch with all Alaskans